Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28390092›Full record

ReviewActa ophthalmologica2018

Clinical impact of inflammation in dry eye disease: proceedings of the ODISSEY group meeting.

Christophe Baudouin, Murat Irkeç, Elisabeth M Messmer, José M Benítez-Del-Castillo, Stefano Bonini, Francisco C Figueiredo, Gerd Geerling, Marc Labetoulle, Michael Lemp, Maurizio Rolando and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ophthalmologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Christophe BaudouinCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, INSERM-DHOS CIC 503, Paris, France.
Murat IrkeçHacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Elisabeth M MessmerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
José M Benítez-Del-CastilloHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Stefano BoniniUniversity Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Francisco C FigueiredoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gerd GeerlingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marc LabetoulleSouth Paris University, Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Michael LempDepartment of Ophthalmology, Georgetown University, Washington, USA.
Maurizio RolandoUniversity of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Gysbert Van SettenSt. Eriks Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pasquale AragonaUniversity of Messina, Messina, Italy.
ODISSEY European Consensus Group Members
Bicêtre Hospital · FRGeorgetown University · USHacettepe University · TRHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBS:t Eriks Ögonsjukhus · SEUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1215-20037Medical Research Council G0900879Medical Research Council MR/S035826/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common, multifactorial ocular condition with major impact on vision and quality of life. It is now well recognized that the pathophysiology of chronic DED can include a cycle of inflammation involving both innate and adaptive immune responses. Recently, in vitro/in vivo models have been used to obtain a better understanding of DED-related inflammatory processes at molecular/cellular levels although they do not truly reproduce the complex and chronic hallmarks of human DED. In clinical DED research, advanced techniques such as impression cytology, conjunctival biopsy, in vivo confocal microscopy and multiplex tear analyses have allowed an improved assessment of inflammation in DED patients. This was supported by the identification of reliable inflammatory markers including matrix metalloproteinase-9, human leucocyte antigen-DR or intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in tears and impression cytology samples. One of the current therapeutic strategies focuses on breaking the inflammatory cycle perpetuating the ocular surface disease, and preclinical/clinical research has led to the development of promising anti-inflammatory compounds. For instance, cyclosporine, already approved in the United States, has recently been authorized in Europe to treat DED associated with severe keratitis. In addition, other agents such as corticosteroids, doxycycline and essential fatty acids, through their anti-inflammatory properties, show encouraging results. We now have a clearer understanding of the inflammatory processes involved in DED, and there is hope that the still emerging preclinical/clinical findings will be translated into new and highly effective therapies for patients in the near future.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCongresses as TopicConjunctivitisDacryocystitisDry Eye SyndromesHumansInflammationKeratitisBiomarkerscytokinesdry eye diseaseHLA-DRhyperosmolarityinflammation

Identifiers

PMID28390092
PMCPMC5836968
OpenAlexW2604355945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.