ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017
Incidental extra-cardiac findings on
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and nature of extracardiac findings in PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Extracardiac findings with increased perfusion during clinical O-15-HJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of unrecognized aortic dissection by hybrid PET/CT rubidium-82 imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Detection efficacy of analog [European radiology · 2023Article
- Incidental Findings onWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2022Article
- Incidental renal masses on SPECT/CT and PET/CT.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Incidental findings on hybrid SPECT-CT and PET-CT scanners: Is it time for new training and reporting guidelines?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Prevalence and variability in reporting of clinically actionable incidental findings on attenuation-correction CT scans in a veteran population.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2017. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of incidental extra-cardiac findings (IECFs) on myocardial perfusion PET/CTs and the prevalence of potentially clinically relevant and clinically irrelevant IECFs, as well as detection rate of previously unknown malignancies. METHODS AND
resultsFrom September 2013 until February 2016, a total of 1397 consecutive patients referred for the evaluation of possible ischemia by
conclusionsIECFs are detected on myocardial perfusion PET/CT in approximately half of the patients. In the present study, IECFs were potentially clinically relevant in 8% of the patients and in 1.4% an unknown malignancy was found, most of which were lung cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28390039What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.