Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28390010›Full record

GuidelineEndocrine2017

Vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and management of major chronic diseases not related to mineral homeostasis in adults: research for evidence and a scientific statement from the European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis (ESCEO).

Luisella Cianferotti, Francesco Bertoldo, Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari, Olivier Bruyere, Cyrus Cooper, Maurizio Cutolo, John A Kanis, Jean-Marc Kaufman, Jean-Yves Reginster, Rene Rizzoli and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Endocrine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Too much vitamin D? a drug safety review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Emerging perspectives: unraveling the anticancer potential of vitamin DNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Vitamin D Measurement: Clinical Practice and Research Implications.The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2023
    Article
  18. Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Luisella CianferottiBone Metabolic Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence and University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco BertoldoDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Heike A Bischoff-FerrariDepartment of Geriatrics and Aging Research, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Olivier BruyereEpidemiology and Public Health, University of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liege, 4000, Belgium.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hants, UK.
Maurizio CutoloResearch Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
John A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Jean-Marc KaufmanDepartment of Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jean-Yves ReginsterDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
Rene RizzoliService of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maria Luisa BrandiBone Metabolic Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence and University of Florence, Florence, Italy. marialuisa.brandi@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-0592
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Liège · BEAustralian Catholic University · AUGhent University Hospital · BEMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Verona · ITUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOptimal vitamin D status promotes skeletal health and is recommended with specific treatment in individuals at high risk for fragility fractures. A growing body of literature has provided indirect and some direct evidence for possible extraskeletal vitamin D-related effects. PURPOSE AND

methodsMembers of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis have reviewed the main evidence for possible proven benefits of vitamin D supplementation in adults at risk of or with overt chronic extra-skeletal diseases, providing recommendations and guidelines for future studies in this field. RESULTS AND

conclusionsRobust mechanistic evidence is available from in vitro studies and in vivo animal studies, usually employing cholecalciferol, calcidiol or calcitriol in pharmacologic rather than physiologic doses. Although many cross-sectional and prospective association studies in humans have shown that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (i.e., <50 nmol/L) are consistently associated with chronic diseases, further strengthened by a dose-response relationship, several meta-analyses of clinical trials have shown contradictory results. Overall, large randomized controlled trials with sufficient doses of vitamin D are missing, and available small to moderate-size trials often included people with baseline levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels >50 nmol/L, did not simultaneously assess multiple outcomes, and did not report overall safety (e.g., falls). Thus, no recommendations can be made to date for the use of vitamin D supplementation in general, parental compounds, or non-hypercalcemic vitamin D analogs in the prevention and treatment of extra-skeletal chronic diseases. Moreover, attainment of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels well above the threshold desired for bone health cannot be recommended based on current evidence, since safety has yet to be confirmed. Finally, the promising findings from mechanistic studies, large cohort studies, and small clinical trials obtained for autoimmune diseases (including type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), cardiovascular disorders, and overall reduction in mortality require further confirmation.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Dietary SupplementsHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMultiple SclerosisVitamin DVitamin DAutoimmune diseasesCancerCardiovascular diseasesCholecalciferolDiabetesMortality

Identifiers

PMID28390010
PMCPMC6776482
OpenAlexW2605097791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.