Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28389905›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017

Fibrin glue as a stabilization strategy in peripheral nerve repair when using porous nerve guidance conduits.

Divya Bhatnagar, Jared S Bushman, N Sanjeeva Murthy, Antonio Merolli, Hilton M Kaplan, Joachim Kohn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Polybutylene succinate artificial scaffold for peripheral nerve regeneration.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Divya BhatnagarNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 145 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Jared S BushmanNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 145 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
N Sanjeeva MurthyNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 145 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Antonio MerolliNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 145 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Hilton M KaplanNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 145 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Joachim KohnNew Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, 145 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. kohn@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-6536
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

RESBIO - the Technology Resource for Polymeric BiomaterialsP41EB001046 · NIBIB · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI KOHN, JOACHIM B. · 2003 to 2017
$17.0M
An engineered graft to encourage preferential motor reinnervation following peripR01NS078385 · NINDS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI KOHN, JOACHIM B., SCHACHNER, MELITTA · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB001046NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous conduits provide a protected pathway for nerve regeneration, while still allowing exchange of nutrients and wastes. However, pore sizes >30 µm may permit fibrous tissue infiltration into the conduit, which may impede axonal regeneration. Coating the conduit with Fibrin Glue (FG) is one option for controlling the conduit's porosity. FG is extensively used in clinical peripheral nerve repair, as a tissue sealant, filler and drug-delivery matrix. Here, we compared the performance of FG to an alternative, hyaluronic acid (HA) as a coating for porous conduits, using uncoated porous conduits and reverse autografts as control groups. The uncoated conduit walls had pores with a diameter of 60 to 70 µm that were uniformly covered by either FG or HA coatings. In vitro, FG coatings degraded twice as fast as HA coatings. In vivo studies in a 1 cm rat sciatic nerve model showed FG coating resulted in poor axonal density (993 ± 854 #/mm

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsNerve RegenerationAnimalsCompressive StrengthCross-Linking ReagentsDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMuscle, SkeletalPolymersPorosityRatsRats, Inbred LewBiocompatible MaterialsCross-Linking ReagentsFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID28389905
PMCPMC5384961
OpenAlexW2604764855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.