ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using detachable ENDO-PSD.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison on the reflux and nutritional status of different reconstruction methods after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes According to Surgical Strategies in Proximal Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life of reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Validation of a novel reconstruction method of laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of reconstruction techniques after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.BMC surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Trapezoidal tunnel intracorporeal esophagogastric anastomosis technique in laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy: technical notes and preliminary experience.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Age-dependent trade-offs between tubular esophagogastric and double-tract anastomosis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The current landscape and advances in functional-preserving gastric cancer surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Comparison of channel esophagogastrostomy and double tract reconstruction after laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Article
- Efficacy of robot-assisted double-flap techniques with refinements to minimize anastomosis-related complications after proximal gastrectomy.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Effect of double-tract reconstruction and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy on immune function and stress.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Oncology safety of proximal gastrectomy for advanced Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction compared with total gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Short-term outcomes and quality of life of esophagogastrostomy versus the double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Double tract reconstruction improves the quality of life and better maintain the BMI of patients with proximal gastric cancer.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Technical variety of anastomotic techniques used in proximal gastrectomy with double-tract-reconstruction - a narrative review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Review
- A multi-center, prospective, clinical study to evaluate the anti-reflux efficacy of laparoscopic double-flap technique (lD-FLAP Study).Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
- Safety and short-term outcomes of a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy versus gastric tube anastomosis after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProximal gastrectomy (PG) is widely performed in Japan as a function-preserving surgical approach. Since esophagogastrostomy (EG) was associated with increased reflux symptoms and anastomotic strictures, we have chosen double-tract reconstruction (DTR) as the standard reconstruction method since March 2013. In this study, we described a novel method of laparoscopic DTR using detachable ENDO-PSD and compared its 1-year outcome with EG performed formerly in our institution.
methodsPatients who underwent laparoscopic PG between May 2005 and July 2014 were retrospectively divided into two groups based on the type of reconstruction and were subsequently analyzed (19 patients in the DTR group and 22 in the EG group). All of them underwent a laparoscopic PG with regional lymph node dissection. In the DTR group, the lower left port site was extended to 4 cm, and an intracorporeal purse-string suture was performed using the detachable ENDO-PSD. The jejunogastrostomy was fashioned on the anterior side of the remnant stomach parallel to the transection line, 2 cm from the cut end. The EG group used the conventional purse-string suture instrument through the 6 cm upper midline mini-laparotomy incision. Patient characteristics, operative data, early operative complications and 1-year postoperative follow-up findings were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe frequencies of reflux symptoms (10.5 vs. 54.5%, P = 0.003), usage of proton pump inhibitors (31.6 vs. 72.7%, P = 0.008), and anastomotic strictures (0 vs. 27%, P = 0.014) were significantly lower in the DTR group as compared to the EG group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, average postoperative/preoperative weight loss ratio, and postoperative/preoperative ratio of biochemical markers (hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, cholesterol).
conclusionOur results indicate that DTR is a useful reconstruction method after PG, especially in terms of preventing reflux esophagitis and anastomotic strictures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.