SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2017
Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the learning curve and mentoring in robotic pancreatectomy: transitioning from novice to expert robotic surgeon.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Step-by-Step Description of Standardized Technique for Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Guideline
- The optimal choice for patients underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic and open surgery: an overview of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- The Revo-i Robotic Surgical System in Advanced Pancreatic Surgery: A Second Non-Randomized Clinical Trial and Comparative Analysis to the da Vinci™ System.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Trial
- Outcomes of Total Pancreatectomy Versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Surgical Management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a bibliometric analysis of trends, key contributors, and collaborations.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pancreatic head clockwise devascularization technique during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy to minimize intraoperative bleeding.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- An Overview for Clinicians on Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs) of the Pancreas.Cancers · 2024Review
- Clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery surgery in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Robot-assisted vascular surgery: literature review, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Impact of hepatic artery variation on surgical and oncological outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Guiding post-pancreaticoduodenectomy interventions for pancreatic cancer patients utilizing decision tree models.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Initial 50 consecutive full-robotic pancreatoduodenectomies without conversion by a single surgeon: a learning curve analysis from a tertiary referral high-volume center.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Robotic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex operation with high perioperative morbidity and mortality, even in the highest volume centers. Since the development of the robotic platform, the number of reports on robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery has been on the rise. This article reviews the current state of completely robotic PD. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature search was performed including studies published between January 2000 and July 2016 reporting PDs in which all procedural steps (dissection, resection and reconstruction) were performed robotically.
resultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 738 patients. Data regarding perioperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, mortality, morbidity, conversion and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. No major differences were observed in mortality, morbidity and oncologic parameters, between robotic and non-robotic approaches. However, operative time was longer in robotic PD, whereas the estimated blood loss was lower. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 6.5-7.8%.
conclusionsRobotic PD is feasible and safe in high-volume institutions, where surgeons are experienced and medical staff are appropriately trained. Randomized controlled trials are required to further investigate outcomes of robotic PD. Additionally, cost analysis and data on long-term oncologic outcomes are needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach in comparison with the open technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28389798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.