Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28389693›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

The Advantages and Challenges of Using FDG PET/CT for Response Assessment in Melanoma in the Era of Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy.

Annie N M Wong, Grant A McArthur, Michael S Hofman, Rodney J Hicks

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of [European radiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. The value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Absolute number of new lesions onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. The Prognostic Value of Biomarkers Identified by [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Development ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. RadioFlow Cytometry Reveals That [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Organ-specific accuracy of [Japanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PET Imaging of VLA-4 in a New BRAFMolecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annie N M WongCancer Medicine, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Grant A McArthurCancer Medicine, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael S HofmanCancer imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Rodney J HicksThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. rod.hicks@petermac.org.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of melanoma has been revolutionised in recent years by advances in the understanding of the genomic landscape of this disease, which has led to the development of new targeted therapeutic agents, and the ability to therapeutically manipulate the immune system through inhibition of cancer cell-T-cell interactions that prevent an adaptive immune response. While these therapeutic interventions have dramatically improved the prospects of survival for patients with advanced melanoma, they bring significant complexity to the interpretation of therapeutic response because their mechanisms and temporal profile of response vary considerably. In this review, we discuss the mode of action of these emerging therapies and their toxicities to provide a framework for the use of FDG PET/CT in therapeutic response assessment. We propose that the greatest utility of PET in assessment of response to agents that abrogate signalling related to BRAF mutation is for early assessment of resistance, while in anti-CTLA4 therapy, immunological flare can compromise early assessment of response but can identify potentially life-threatening autoimmune reactions. For anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy, the role of FDG PET/CT is more akin to its use in other solid malignancies undergoing treatment with conventional chemotherapy. However, further research is required to optimise the timing of scans and response criteria in this disease.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmunotherapyMelanomaMolecular Targeted TherapyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18BRAFImmune responseMelanomaPETTherapeutic monitoring

Identifiers

PMID28389693
OpenAlexW2605094777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.