ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2017
Microbiota in Exhaled Breath Condensate and the Lung.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Human Respiratory Virome in Health and Disease: Interactions, Dysbiosis, and Methodological Challenges.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Microbial biomarker development for detection and prognosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Review
- Breath biopsy biomarkers: cell-free nucleic acids in exhaled breath condensate.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- The lung microbiome: progress and promise.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Review
- Exhaled Breath Condensate-A Non-Invasive Approach for Diagnostic Methods in Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- Perspectives in lung microbiome research.Current opinion in microbiology · 2020Review
- Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis.mBio · 2020Article
- Methods in Lung Microbiome Research.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2020Review
- The Madness of Microbiome: Attempting To Find Consensus "Best Practice" for 16S Microbiome Studies.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The lung microbiota is commonly sampled using relatively invasive bronchoscopic procedures. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection potentially offers a less invasive alternative for lung microbiota sampling. We compared lung microbiota samples retrieved by protected specimen brushings (PSB) and exhaled breath condensate collection. We also sought to assess whether aerosolized antibiotic treatment would influence the lung microbiota and whether this change could be detected in EBC. EBC was collected from 6 conscious sheep and then from the same anesthetized sheep during mechanical ventilation. Following the latter EBC collection, PSB samples were collected from separate sites within each sheep lung. On the subsequent day, each sheep was then treated with nebulized colistimethate sodium. Two days after nebulization, EBC and PSB samples were again collected. Bacterial DNA was quantified using 16S rRNA gene quantitative PCR. The V2-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. Quality control and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering were performed with mothur. The EBC samples contained significantly less bacterial DNA than the PSB samples. The EBC samples from anesthetized animals clustered separately by their bacterial community compositions in comparison to the PSB samples, and 37 bacterial OTUs were identified as differentially abundant between the two sample types. Despite only low concentrations of colistin being detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, PSB samples were found to differ by their bacterial compositions before and after colistimethate sodium treatment. Our findings indicate that microbiota in EBC samples and PSB samples are not equivalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.