Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017
Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urination Stimulation Techniques for Collecting Clean Urine Samples in Infants Under One Year: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Practice variation in urine collection methods among pre-toilet trained children with suspected urinary tract infection: a systematic review.BMC pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for management of urinary tract infection and primary vesicoureteric reflux.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Guideline
- Evaluation of the Quick Wee method of inducing faster clean catch urine collection in pre-continent infants: a randomized controlled trial.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Can the Bladder Stimulation Technique Solve the Urine Collection Chaos in the Pediatric Emergency Department? A Prospective Comparison with the Traditional Bag Method.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fully Automated Serum LC-MS/MS Platform and Pediatric Reference Intervals for Organic Acids, Amino Acids, and Acylcarnitines in Children (Ages 0-6 Years): Toward Quantitative Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Metabolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Waiting on the Urine: The Impact of Delayed Urine Collection on Length of Stay in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Feasibility of home-based urine collection in children under 5 years in the ORIGINS birth cohort study: mixed method protocol and sample completion results.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinician and parent views on urine collection in precontinent children in the UK: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review.Trials · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Use for Common Infections in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical prediction rules for childhood urinary tract infections: a cross-sectional study in ambulatory care.BJGP open · 2022Article
- GPs' perspectives on diagnosing childhood urinary tract infections: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
- Urine collection methods for infants under 3 months of age in clinical practice.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Observational
- Fully Automated Quantitative Measurement of Serum Organic Acids via LC-MS/MS for the Diagnosis of Organic Acidemias: Establishment of an Automation System and a Proof-of-Concept Validation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.