Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28389417›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2017

Determinants of Participants' Follow-Up and Characterization of Representativeness in Flu Near You, A Participatory Disease Surveillance System.

Kristin Baltrusaitis, Mauricio Santillana, Adam W Crawley, Rumi Chunara, Mark Smolinski, John S Brownstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A better normal in Canada will need a better detection system for emerging and re-emerging respiratory pathogens.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Global monitoring of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic through online surveys sampled from the Facebook user base.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin BaltrusaitisComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-9513
Mauricio SantillanaComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4206-418X
Adam W CrawleySkoll Global Threats Fund, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-3889
Rumi ChunaraThe Global Institute of Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-7259
Mark SmolinskiSkoll Global Threats Fund, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-8241
John S BrownsteinComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-5317
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBoston University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training for BiostatisticiansT32GM074905 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WHITE, LAURA FORSBERG · 2005 to 2019
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlu Near You (FNY) is an Internet-based participatory surveillance system in the United States and Canada that allows volunteers to report influenza-like symptoms using a brief weekly symptom report.

objectiveOur objective was to evaluate the representativeness of the FNY population compared with the general population of the United States, explore the demographic and behavioral characteristics associated with FNY's high-participation users, and summarize results from a user survey of a cohort of FNY participants.

methodsWe compared (1) the representativeness of sex and age groups of FNY participants during the 2014-2015 flu season versus the general US population and (2) the distribution of Human Development Index (HDI) scores of FNY participants versus that of the general US population. We analyzed associations between demographic and behavioral factors and the level of participant follow-up (ie, high vs low). Finally, descriptive statistics of responses from FNY's 2015 and 2016 end-of-season user surveys were calculated.

resultsDuring the 2014-2015 influenza season, 47,234 unique participants had at least one FNY symptom report that was either self-reported (users) or submitted on their behalf (household members). The proportion of female FNY participants was significantly higher than that of the general US population (n=28,906, 61.2% vs 51.1%, P<.001). Although each age group was represented in the FNY population, the age distribution was significantly different from that of the US population (P<.001). Compared with the US population, FNY had a greater proportion of individuals with HDI >5.0, signaling that the FNY user distribution was more affluent and educated than the US population baseline. We found that high-participation use (ie, higher participation in follow-up symptom reports) was associated with sex (females were 25% less likely than men to be high-participation users), higher HDI, not reporting an influenza-like illness at the first symptom report, older age, and reporting for household members (all differences between high- and low-participation users P<.001). Approximately 10% of FNY users completed an additional survey at the end of the flu season that assessed detailed user characteristics (3217/33,324 in 2015; 4850/44,313 in 2016). Of these users, most identified as being either retired or employed in the health, education, and social services sectors and indicated that they achieved a bachelor's degree or higher.

conclusionsThe representativeness of the FNY population and characteristics of its high-participation users are consistent with what has been observed in other Internet-based influenza surveillance systems. With targeted recruitment of underrepresented populations, FNY may improve as a complementary system to timely tracking of flu activity, especially in populations that do not seek medical attention and in areas with poor official surveillance data.

Indexed as

community-based participatory researchcrowdsourcingdigital disease detectioninfluenza, humanpublic health informaticspublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID28389417
PMCPMC5400887
OpenAlexW2604251580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.