Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28389373›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2017

Tumor Spread through Air Spaces Affects the Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma >2 to 3 cm.

Chenyang Dai, Huikang Xie, Hang Su, Yunlang She, Erjia Zhu, Ziwen Fan, Fangyu Zhou, Yijiu Ren, Dong Xie, Hui Zheng and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Chenyang DaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Huikang XieDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hang SuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yunlang SheDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Erjia ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ziwen FanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fangyu ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yijiu RenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Dong XieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hui ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiermaimaiti KadeerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Donglai ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Liping ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Gening JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chunyan WuDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chang ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: chenthoracic@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is a novel invasive pattern in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). The effects of the combination of STAS and tumor size on survival have not been well studied.

methodsA total of 383 patients with ADC 3 cm or smaller (stage IA) and 161 patients with stage IB ADC were identified from 2009 to 2010. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients as stratified by STAS and tumor size. A validation cohort was included in this study.

resultsSTAS was observed in 116 ADCs 3 cm or smaller (30.3%). In cases involving ADCs 3 cm or smaller, patients with STAS had worse RFS (p = 0.006) and OS rates (p < 0.001) than those without STAS. Furthermore, comparable RFS (p = 0.091) and OS (p = 0.443) rates were observed in patients with ADCs 3 cm or smaller with STAS present and those with stage IB ADC. Multivariate analysis revealed STAS to be an independent prognostic factor in ADCs 3 cm or smaller (RFS, p = 0.043; OS, p = 0.009). Among patients with ADCs larger than 2 to 3 cm, STAS still stratified the prognosis. Moreover, the unfavorable prognosis of patients with ADCs larger than 2 to 3 cm with STAS present was similar to that of patients with stage IB ADC. Among patients with ADCs 2 cm or smaller, STAS failed to stratify the prognosis significantly. Similar results were obtained in the validation cohort.

conclusionsThese results provide preliminary evidence that STAS could be considered as a factor in a staging system to predict prognosis more precisely, especially in ADCs larger than 2 to 3 cm.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisSurvival AnalysisAdenocarcinomaInvasionPrognosisRecurrenceSpread through air spaces

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.