Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017
Auto detection and segmentation of daily living activities during a Timed Up and Go task in people with Parkinson's disease using multiple inertial sensors.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)-More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- On mobility and gait in scoliosis patients: a comparison of conventional and 3D-printed braces during an instrumented timed-up and go test.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- Instrumented Timed Up and Go Analysis Identifies Biomechanical Markers Across Early Hoehn and Yahr Stages of Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Six-minute walk test instrumented with a single inertial sensor: dataset from healthy adults of different ages.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A method for detection of functional deficiencies due to unilateral vestibular impairment using the TUG test and IMU sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Framework Oriented to Pathological Gait Recognition with Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Walk Longer! Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Uncover Which Gait Aspects Should Be Treated to Increase Walking Endurance in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Innovative Detection and Segmentation of Mobility Activities in Patients Living with Parkinson's Disease Using a Single Ankle-Positioned Smartwatch.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- L Test Subtask Segmentation for Lower-Limb Amputees Using a Random Forest Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Novel Framework Based on Deep Learning Architecture for Continuous Human Activity Recognition with Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Observational
- Research priorities in HIV, aging and rehabilitation: building on a framework with the Canada-International HIV and Rehabilitation Research Collaborative.AIDS research and therapy · 2023Article
- Machine learning based estimation of dynamic balance and gait adaptability in persons with neurological diseases using inertial sensors.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep Learning-Based Subtask Segmentation of Timed Up-and-Go Test Using RGB-D Cameras.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impact of Parkinson's Disease on Functional Mobility at Different Stages.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Assessment of movement disorders using wearable sensors during upper limb tasks: A scoping review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Improved Self-Organizing Map-Based Unsupervised Learning Algorithm for Sitting Posture Recognition System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Wearables: Fit for Medical Use?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Subtask Segmentation of Timed Up and Go Test for Mobility Assessment of Perioperative Total Knee Arthroplasty.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWearable sensors have the potential to provide clinicians with access to motor performance of people with movement disorder as they undergo intervention. However, sensor data often have to be manually classified and segmented before they can be processed into clinical metrics. This process can be time consuming. We recently proposed detection and segmentation algorithms based on peak detection using Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to automatically identify and isolate common activities during daily living such as standing up, walking, turning, and sitting down. These algorithms were developed using a homogenous population of healthy older adults. The aim of this study was to investigate the transferability of these algorithms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD).
methodsA modified Timed Up And Go task was used since it is comprised of these activities, all performed in a continuous fashion. Twelve older adults diagnosed with early PD (Hoehn & Yahr ≤ 2) were recruited for the study and performed three trials of a 10 and 5-m TUG during OFF state. They were outfitted with 17 IMUs covering each body segment. Raw data from IMUs were detrended, normalized and filtered to reveal kinematics peaks that corresponded to different activities. Segmentation was accomplished by identifying the first minimum or maximum to the right and the left of these peaks. Segmentation times were compared to results from two examiners who visually segmented the activities. Specificity and sensitivity were used to evaluate the accuracy of the detection algorithms.
resultsUsing the same IMUs and algorithms developed in the previous study, we were able to detect these activities with 97.6% sensitivity and 92.7% specificity (n = 432) in PD population. However, with modifications to the IMUs selection, we were able to detect these activities with 100% accuracy. Similarly, applying the same segmentation to PD population, we were able to isolate these activities within ~500 ms of the visual segmentation. Re-optimizing the filtering frequencies, we were able to reduce this difference to ~400 ms.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the agility and transferability of using a system of IMUs to accurately detect and segment activities in daily living in people with movement disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.