Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28388713›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

Point/counterpoint: randomized versus single-arm phase II clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Stuart A Grossman, Karisa C Schreck, Karla Ballman, Brian Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma (NRG Oncology HN002).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Novel Clinical Trial Designs in Neuro-Oncology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Glioblastoma Clinical Trials: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. An Overview of Phase 2 Clinical Trial Designs.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stuart A GrossmanSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Karisa C SchreckSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Karla BallmanWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Brian AlexanderDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineGlioblastomaHumansTreatment OutcomeDacarbazineclinical trialsnewly diagnosed glioblastomaphase IIrandomizedsingle-arm

Identifiers

PMID28388713
PMCPMC5464324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.