ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017
Poor performance of the rapid test for human brucellosis in health facilities in Kenya.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and speciation of brucellosis in febrile patients from a pastoralist community of Tanzania.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Breaking professional silos to combat brucellosis: a pilot feasibility and proof-of-concept study of interprofessional education to strengthen healthcare capacity in Côte d'Ivoire.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- High prevalence of Q fever among patients clinically diagnosed with brucellosis in a Kenyan pastoralist community.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2026Article
- Design of a Prospective Human-Animal Cohort Study to Evaluate the Role of Camels and Other Livestock Species in the Transmission ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Integrated Surveillance for Human and Animal Brucellosis in Kenya: A Predictive Analysis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Brucellosis in Humans and Animals: A Meta-Analytical Approach.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Understanding brucellosis: knowledge, perceptions, and self-reported prevalence among agro-pastoralists in Nakasongola, Uganda.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Sero-prevalence and risk factors associated with occurrence of anti-Brucella antibodies among slaughterhouse workers in Uganda.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Effect of awareness training to frontline health workers and the use of e-based technology on reporting of brucellosis cases in selected pastoral communities, Tanzania: a quasi-experimental study.One health outlook · 2023Article
- Brucellosis and One Health: Inherited and Future Challenges.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Human brucellosis in Baringo County, Kenya: Evaluating the diagnostic kits used and identifying infecting Brucella species.PloS one · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Study of Selected Bacterial Zoonoses in Small Ruminants in Tana River County, Kenya.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Facing the Human and Animal Brucellosis Conundrums: The Forgotten Lessons.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Brucellosis testing patterns at health facilities in Arusha region, northern Tanzania.PloS one · 2022Article
- Integrated human-animal sero-surveillance of Brucellosis in the pastoral Afar and Somali regions of Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Biosensors for European Zoonotic Agents: A Current Portuguese Perspective.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction for Rapid Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Archives of Razi Institute · 2021Article
- Brucellosis of unknown origin with haemophagocytic syndrome: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Brucellosis: Prevalence with reference to East African community countries - A rapid review.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Review
- Performance characteristics and costs of serological tests for brucellosis in a pastoralist community of northern Tanzania.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Human brucellosis is considered to be an important but typically under-diagnosed cause of febrile illness in many low and middle-income countries. In Kenya, and throughout East Africa, laboratory diagnosis for the disease is based primarily on the febrile antigen Brucella agglutination test (FBAT), yet few studies of the diagnostic accuracy of this test exist. Assessment of the performance of the FBAT is essential for its appropriate clinical use, as well as for evaluating surveillance data reported by public health systems. To assess FBAT performance, we collected sera from people with symptoms compatible with brucellosis attending two health facilities in Busia County, Kenya. Sera were tested using the FBAT and results compared with those from the Rose Bengal Test (RBT), an assay with well-known performance characteristics. Positives on either test were confirmed using the classical serum agglutination test (SAT)-Coombs test combination and a rapid IgM/IgG lateral flow immunochromatography assay (LFA). A questionnaire focussing on known risk factors for exposure to Brucella spp. was also conducted, and relationships with FBAT positivity examined using logistic regression. Out of 825 recruited individuals, 162 (19.6%) were classified as positive using the FBAT. In contrast, only eight (1.0%) were positive using the RBT. Of the 162 FBAT positives, one (0.62%) had an atypical agglutination in SAT and three (1.9%) showed low Coombs titres. Out of 148 FBAT positive individuals tested using the LFA, five (3.4%) were IgM positive and none were IgG positive. Poor or no correlation was observed between FBAT results and most established risk factors for Brucella infection. We observed substantial disagreement between the FBAT and a number of well-known serological tests, with the majority of reactive FBAT results appearing to be false positives. Poor FBAT specificity, combined with a lack of confirmatory testing, strongly suggests overdiagnosis of brucellosis is common in this low prevalence setting. This is expected to have important economic impacts on affected patients subjected to the long and likely unnecessary courses of multiple antibiotics required for treatment of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.