Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28388454›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatry research2017

Initial Steps to inform selection of continuation cognitive therapy or fluoxetine for higher risk responders to cognitive therapy for recurrent major depressive disorder.

Jeffrey R Vittengl, Lee Anna Clark, Michael E Thase, Robin B Jarrett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatry research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R VittenglDepartment of Psychology, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO, USA. Electronic address: vittengl@truman.edu.
Lee Anna ClarkDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Michael E ThaseDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robin B JarrettDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: Robin.Jarrett@UTSouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USTruman State University · USUniversity of Notre Dame · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

PROPHYLACTIC COGNITIVE THERAPY FOR DEPRESSIONR01MH058397 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JARRETT, ROBIN B · 2000 to 2011
$4.1M
PROPHYLACTIC COGNITIVE THERAPY FOR DEPRESSIONR01MH058356 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI THASE, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2010
$3.5M
Are Cognitive Therapy's Antidepressant Effects Durable?R01MH069619 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JARRETT, ROBIN B · 2004 to 2009
$1.7M
Are Cognitive Therapy's Antidepressant Effects Durable?R01MH069618 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FRIEDMAN, EDWARD S. · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
Cognitive Therapy for High Risk &Refractory DepressionK24MH001571 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JARRETT, ROBIN B · 2005 to 2009
$625k
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH001571NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058356NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058397NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069618NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responders to acute-phase cognitive therapy (A-CT) for major depressive disorder (MDD) often relapse or recur, but continuation-phase cognitive therapy (C-CT) or fluoxetine reduces risks for some patients. We tested composite moderators of C-CT versus fluoxetine's preventive effects to inform continuation treatment selection. Responders to A-CT for MDD judged to be at higher risk for relapse due to unstable or partial remission (N=172) were randomized to 8 months of C-CT or fluoxetine with clinical management and assessed, free from protocol treatment, for 24 additional months. Pre-continuation-treatment characteristics that in survival analyses moderated treatments' effects on relapse over 8 months of continuation-phase treatment (residual symptoms and negative temperament) and on relapse/recurrence over the full observation period's 32 months (residual symptoms and age) were combined to estimate the potential advantage of C-CT versus fluoxetine for individual patients. Assigning patients to optimal continuation treatment (i.e., to C-CT or fluoxetine, depending on patients' pre-continuation-treatment characteristics) resulted in absolute reduction of relapse or recurrence risk by 16-21% compared to the other non-optimal treatment. Although these novel results require replication before clinical application, selecting optimal continuation treatment (i.e., personalizing treatment) for higher risk A-CT responders may decrease risks of MDD relapse and recurrence substantively.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleFluoxetineHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationFluoxetineCognitive therapyFluoxetineMajor depressive disorderPersonalized advantage indexPersonalized medicineRecurrenceRelapse

Identifiers

PMID28388454
PMCPMC5481171
OpenAlexW2602670734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.