Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28387705›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

An Overview of Literature Topics Related to Current Concepts, Methods, Tools, and Applications for Cumulative Risk Assessment (2007-2016).

Mary A Fox, L Elizabeth Brewer, Lawrence Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital health for climate change mitigation and response: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Framing Environmental Health Decision-Making: The Struggle over Cumulative Impacts Policy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021
    Article
  10. A Cumulative Risk Perspective for Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Review of Methods for Assessing the Environmental Health Impacts of an Agricultural System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary A FoxDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. mfox9@jhu.edu.
L Elizabeth BrewerOffice of the Science Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Washington, DC 20004, USA. brewer.beth@epa.gov.
Lawrence MartinOffice of the Science Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20004, USA. martin.lawrence@epa.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cumulative risk assessments (CRAs) address combined risks from exposures to multiple chemical and nonchemical stressors and may focus on vulnerable communities or populations. Significant contributions have been made to the development of concepts, methods, and applications for CRA over the past decade. Work in both human health and ecological cumulative risk has advanced in two different contexts. The first context is the effects of chemical mixtures that share common modes of action, or that cause common adverse outcomes. In this context two primary models are used for predicting mixture effects, dose addition or response addition. The second context is evaluating the combined effects of chemical and nonchemical (e.g., radiation, biological, nutritional, economic, psychological, habitat alteration, land-use change, global climate change, and natural disasters) stressors. CRA can be adapted to address risk in many contexts, and this adaptability is reflected in the range in disciplinary perspectives in the published literature. This article presents the results of a literature search and discusses a range of selected work with the intention to give a broad overview of relevant topics and provide a starting point for researchers interested in CRA applications.

Indexed as

EcosystemEcotoxicologyEnvironmental ExposureGenetic MarkersGeographic Information SystemsHealth StatusHumansRisk AssessmentGenetic Markerschemical mixturecommunity healthcumulative risk assessmentecological healthenvironmental justicenonchemical stressorvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID28387705
PMCPMC5409590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.