ReviewJournal of athletic training2017
If You're Not Measuring, You're Guessing: The Advent of Objective Concussion Assessments.
Review in Journal of athletic training, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Sport-Related Concussion Screening for Collegiate Athletes Using an Instrumented Balance Assessment.Journal of athletic training · 2018Trial
- Neurophysiological and gait outcomes during a dual-task gait assessment in concussed adolescents.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2023Article
- Investigating the diagnostic accuracy of a paper-and-pencil and a computerized cognitive test battery for pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.Neuropsychology · 2022Article
- Network Analysis of Sport-Related Concussion Research During the Past Decade (2010-2019).Journal of athletic training · 2021Article
- Arabic translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5).Biology of sport · 2021Article
- Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020Article
- On the time-course of functional connectivity: theory of a dynamic progression of concussion effects.Brain communications · 2020Article
- Neurophysiological Correlates of Concussion: Deep Learning for Clinical Assessment.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sport-related concussion remains one of the most complex injuries presented to sports medicine professionals. Although the injury has been recognized since ancient times, the concussion-assessment process has seen significant advances over the last 30 years. This review outlines the addition of objective measures to the clinical evaluation of the concussed athlete, beginning in the 1980s and continuing through the modern age. International and domestic organizations now describe standardized symptom reports, neurostatus and neurocognitive-function evaluations, and postural-control measures as standards of medical care, a significant shift from a short time ago. Despite this progression, much about the injury remains unknown, including new clinical and research-based assessment techniques and how the injury may influence the athlete's cognitive health over the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.