SO

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cost-effective lanthanum-promoted iron catalyst on coal gangue-derived mesoporous γ-AlScientific reports · 2025
   Article
2. Promoting economic and environmental resilience in the post-COVID-19 era through the city and regional on-road fuel sustainability development.npj urban sustainability · 2022
   Article
3. Factor decomposition and decoupling analysis of air pollutant emissions in China's iron and steel industry.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
   Article
4. Source contributions of surface ozone in China using an adjoint sensitivity analysis.The Science of the total environment · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract