Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28387061›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2018

Gestational diabetes mellitus and first trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein A: A case-control study in a Chinese population.

Di Xiao, Wang Chenhong, Xu Yanbin, Zhou Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. First-trimester biomarkers of gestational diabetes mellitus: A scoping review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Di XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-647X
Wang ChenhongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xu YanbinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhou LuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionTo investigate the relationship between pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to determine whether PAPP-A has improved value for predicting GDM in a Chinese population. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical data for 599 GDM patients and 986 unaffected pregnant women undergoing both antenatal examinations and delivery were retrospectively analyzed. First-trimester serum PAPP-A levels were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors for GDM, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the value of PAPP-A for predicting GDM.

resultsGDM-affected and unaffected pregnant women were significantly different in terms of age (P < 0.001), BMI (P < 0.001), family history of diabetes (P = 0.002), α-thalassemia trait (P < 0.01), parity (P < 0.001), conception methods (P < 0.001), gestational weeks at the time of labor (P < 0.001) and corrected PAPP-A multiples of the median values (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that PAPP-A levels were negatively related to the subsequent development of GDM (odds ratio 0.798, 95% confidence interval 0.647-0.984). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for maternal factors was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.657-0.711), and did not significantly differ from that for the combination of maternal factors and serum PAPP-A levels, which was 0.686 (95% CI: 0.660-0.713; χ

conclusionsSerum PAPP-A was an independent factor for the development of GDM in pregnant Chinese women. Serum-PAPP-A does not have improved value with respect to predicting GDM when combined with other maternal factors.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChinaDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-APregnancy Trimester, FirstRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersPAPPA protein, humanPregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-AGestational diabetes mellitusPredictive valuePregnancy-associated plasma protein A

Identifiers

PMID28387061
PMCPMC5754543
OpenAlexW2604697858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.