ArticleJapan journal of nursing science : JJNS2018
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Cultural Competence Assessment.
Article in Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between the Nursing Practice Environment and Culturally Competent Behaviors Among Surgical Nurses in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Dutch-translated cultural competence assessment scale for nurses: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Community pharmacists' cultural competence and awareness in healthcare delivery: a cross-sectional study on perceptions, practices, and demographic influences in the United Arab Emirates.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- The animated assessment of theory of mind for people with schizophrenia (AToMS): development and psychometric evaluation.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of Turkish Version of the Cultural Competence Assessment Tool: CCA-EUnurse Project.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cultural competence among nursing students and nurses working in acute care settings: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The German version of the Cultural Competence Assessment (CCA-G): cross-cultural adaptation and validation study in Austrian acute care settings.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Perceptions of Brain Injury Survey.Journal of nursing measurement · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe 25 item Cultural Competence Assessment assesses the cultural competence of multiple types of healthcare providers. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the questionnaire (KCCA) and to determine the need for changes to improve its validity and reliability.
methodsData from 161 hospital nurses were used for the item analysis and to assess the reliability and construct validity of the KCCA before and after the deletion of nine items.
resultsThe KCCA did not demonstrate acceptable construct validity and subscale internal reliability. Nine items with high interitem correlations, high modification indices, and relatively lower factor loadings were deleted. The 16 item Modified KCCA showed improved construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability.
conclusionWhile further psychometric evaluation of the Modified KCCA should be undertaken with larger samples and diverse professionals, the study's data provide evidence that the Modified KCCA might be a more suitable measure for use among Korean healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.