ReviewPest management science2017
Induced plant defences in biological control of arthropod pests: a double-edged sword.
Review in Pest management science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Protection: Focusing on Plant-Feeding Mites.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Near chromosome-level genome assembly of Neomusotima conspurcatalis gives insights into the evolution of moth genome architecture and fern-insect interactions.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Can biological control involving predatory mites mitigate plant stress caused by phytophagous mites?Planta · 2026Review
- Phytochemical-Mediated Tritrophic Interactions: Effects of Pepper and Eggplant Cultivars on the Green Peach AphidInsects · 2025Article
- Eco-smart biocontrol strategies utilizing potent microbes for sustainable management of phytopathogenic diseases.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- The Key Role of Plant Hormone Signaling Transduction and Flavonoid Biosynthesis Pathways in the Response of Chinese Pine (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Kill rate as a tool in efficiency evaluation of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) mass reared on factitious food.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2023Article
- Interactions between the omnivorous bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) and the tomato pests Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Phthorimaea absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): predation, phytophagy, and prey preference.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2023Article
- Bringing Fundamental Insights of Induced Resistance to Agricultural Management of Herbivore Pests.Journal of chemical ecology · 2023Review
- Herbivore-Dependent Induced Volatiles in Pear Plants Cause Differential Attractive Response by Lacewing Larvae.Journal of chemical ecology · 2023Article
- Plant-Mediated Effects of Beneficial Microbes and a Plant Strengthener against Spider Mites in Tomato.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Phytoseiid and Iolinid Mites for Biological Control of the Tomato Russet MiteInsects · 2022Article
- Enhanced top-down control of herbivore population growth on plants with impaired defences.Functional ecology · 2022Article
- Tritrophic defenses as a central pivot of low-emission, pest-suppressive farming systems.Current opinion in environmental sustainability · 2022Review
- Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defense Tools against Herbivores for Sustainable Crop Protection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Anti-herbivore activity of soluble silicon for crop protection in agriculture: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Elicitor Application in Strawberry Results in Long-Term Increase of Plant Resilience Without Yield Loss.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Targeting diamondback moths in greenhouses by attracting specific native parasitoids with herbivory-induced plant volatiles.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Bugs scaring bugs: enemy-risk effects in biological control systems.Ecology letters · 2020Review
- Plant resistance does not compromise parasitoid-based biocontrol of a strawberry pest.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological control is an important ecosystem service delivered by natural enemies. Together with breeding for plant defence, it constitutes one of the most promising alternatives to pesticides for controlling herbivores in sustainable crop production. Especially induced plant defences may be promising targets in plant breeding for resistance against arthropod pests. Because they are activated upon herbivore damage, costs are only incurred when defence is needed. Moreover, they can be more specific than constitutive defences. Nevertheless, inducible defence traits that are harming plant pest organisms may interfere with biological control agents, such as predators and parasitoids. Despite the vast fundamental knowledge on plant defence mechanisms and their effects on natural enemies, our understanding of the feasibility of combining biological control with induced plant defence in practice is relatively poor. In this review, we focus on arthropod pest control and present the most important features of biological control with natural enemies and of induced plant defence. Furthermore, we show potential synergies and conflicts among them and, finally, identify gaps and list opportunities for their combined use in crop protection. We suggest that breeders should focus on inducible resistance traits that are compatible with the natural enemies of arthropod pests, specifically traits that help communities of natural enemies to build up. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.