Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2017
Analgesia and side effects of the addition of 10 or 20 µg fentanyl to articaine in spinal anesthesia for knee arthroscopy: a randomized and observer-blinded study.
Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesArticaine, a popular and rapidly acting local anesthetic in dentistry, has been also found to be beneficial in ambulatory spinal anesthesia. Analgesia in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period may be further improved by adding fentanyl to the local anesthetic solution for spinal anesthesia. The aim was to evaluate dose-dependency of analgesia and side effects associated with intrathecal fentanyl additive to articaine for spinal anesthesia in knee arthroscopy patients.
methodsIn this randomized, observer- and patient-blinded study, 90 adult patients scheduled for elective ambulatory knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia were randomized into three groups: plain articaine 60 mg with saline (group AF0), articaine 60 mg with fentanyl 10 µg (group AF10) or 20 µg (group AF20) in a total volume of 1.9 ml. The blinded observer tested the sensory and the motor block, and performed telephone interviews on the first and seventh postoperative days.
resultsThe median (IQR) duration of sensory block at the dermatomal level of T10 was significantly longer in groups AF10, 69 min (56) and AF20, 69 min (45) than in group AF0, 41 min (35) (p = 0.013). Motor block duration was similar in all groups (median 120 min). Group AF20 patients experienced pruritus significantly more often than patients in the other groups (p = 0.039). No acute or late anesthetic side effects occurred, and satisfaction with the anesthetic technique was the same in all groups (97% satisfied).
conclusionsFentanyl 10 or 20 µg as additive to articaine for spinal anesthesia prolonged the duration of sensory block significantly and similarly. Fentanyl 20 µg was more often associated with pruritus than fentanyl 10 µg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.