Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28386698›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

Comparison of some behavioral effects of d- and l-methamphetamine in adult male rats.

Justin N Siemian, Zhaoxia Xue, Bruce E Blough, Jun-Xu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reinforcing and Stimulant-Like Effects of Methamphetamine Isomers in Rhesus Macaques.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Claustrum-Prefrontal Cortex Pathway Regulates Impulsive-Like Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Justin N SiemianDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Zhaoxia XueDepartment of Medical Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Bruce E BloughCenter for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.
Jun-Xu LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. junxuli@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USRTI International · USShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

IMIDAZOLINE I2 RECEPTORS AS TARGETS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAINR01DA034806 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
TAAR 1 modulation of addiction-related effects of nicotineR21DA040777 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2016 to 2017
$479k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034806NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleBoth l- and d-methamphetamine (l- and d-MA) are more potent to release norpepinephrine (NE) than dopamine, and the selectivity is greater for l-MA than d-MA. Little is known of the in vivo pharmacology of l-MA.

objectiveThis study compared the effects of l-MA and d-MA in assays of nociception, behavioral disruption, and impulsivity.

methodsAntinociceptive effects of d- and l-MA were examined in two pain assays: the warm water tail withdrawal test for acute nociception and the von Frey test in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-treated rats for chronic inflammatory pain. Food-maintained operant responding and locomotion tests were used to assess generalized behavioral disruption. The 5-choice serial reaction time test (5-CSRTT) was used to assess drug-induced effects on impulse control. A delay discounting procedure was used to determine drug-induced changes in sensitivity to reinforcer delay (impulsive choice).

resultsl-MA (3.2-10 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent antinociception in both pain assays, decreased the rate of food-maintained operant responding, and decreased locomotor activity at a higher dose (17.8 mg/kg). In contrast, d-MA (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) did not produce antinociception in either assay, produced biphasic effects on response rate, and increased locomotor activity. In the 5-CSRTT, d-MA but not l-MA produced significant increase in premature responses. In the delay discounting procedure, both drugs did not affect the delay function at doses that did not increase omissions.

conclusionsThese data suggest that d- and l-MA have different behavioral profiles. Consideration should be given to these differences in future studies when l-MA is proposed for potential therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorDelay DiscountingFoodImpulsive BehaviorMaleMethamphetaminePainRatsReaction TimeMethamphetamine5-CSRTTAntinociceptionDelay discountingl-MethamphetamineLocomotionOperant respondingRats

Identifiers

PMID28386698
PMCPMC5482751
OpenAlexW2604934259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.