Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28386558›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2017

Mathematical and Computational Modeling in Complex Biological Systems.

Zhiwei Ji, Ke Yan, Wenyang Li, Haigen Hu, Xiaoliang Zhu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Future of Burn Care From a Complexity Science Perspective.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multiscale modeling in disease.Current opinion in systems biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiwei JiSchool of Information & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-3465
Ke YanCollege of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, 258 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou 310018, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-6636
Wenyang LiChongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences and College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Haigen HuInstitute of Computer Vision, College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5863-8283
Xiaoliang ZhuSchool of Information & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Zhejiang Gongshang University · CNChina Jiliang University · CNStomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNZhejiang University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological process and molecular functions involved in the cancer progression remain difficult to understand for biologists and clinical doctors. Recent developments in high-throughput technologies urge the systems biology to achieve more precise models for complex diseases. Computational and mathematical models are gradually being used to help us understand the omics data produced by high-throughput experimental techniques. The use of computational models in systems biology allows us to explore the pathogenesis of complex diseases, improve our understanding of the latent molecular mechanisms, and promote treatment strategy optimization and new drug discovery. Currently, it is urgent to bridge the gap between the developments of high-throughput technologies and systemic modeling of the biological process in cancer research. In this review, we firstly studied several typical mathematical modeling approaches of biological systems in different scales and deeply analyzed their characteristics, advantages, applications, and limitations. Next, three potential research directions in systems modeling were summarized. To conclude, this review provides an update of important solutions using computational modeling approaches in systems biology.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSystems BiologyComputational BiologyHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28386558
PMCPMC5366773
OpenAlexW2595828237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.