ArticleJournal of optics (2010)2016
Roadmap on neurophotonics.
Article in Journal of optics (2010), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging the enteric nervous system.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025Review
- Neurophotonics: a comprehensive review, current challenges and future trends.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Numerical Calculation of the Light Propagation in Tapered Optical Fibers for Optical Neural Interfaces.Journal of lightwave technology : a joint IEEE/OSA publication · 2022Article
- Modulating cell signalling in vivo with magnetic nanotransducers.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
- Influence of the anatomical features of different brain regions on the spatial localization of fiber photometry signals.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Neurophotonics Approaches for the Study of Pattern Separation.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2020Review
- Acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography for elasticity assessment of soft tissues.Applied spectroscopy reviews · 2019Article
- Laser micromachining of tapered optical fibers for spatially selective control of neural activity.Microelectronic engineering · 2018Article
- Tailoring light delivery for optogenetics by modal demultiplexing in tapered optical fibers.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Tapered Fibers Combined With a Multi-Electrode Array for Optogenetics in Mouse Medial Prefrontal Cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Quantitative angle-insensitive flow measurement using relative standard deviation OCT.Applied physics letters · 2017Article
- Longitudinal shear wave imaging for elasticity mapping using optical coherence elastography.Applied physics letters · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic understanding of how the brain gives rise to complex behavioral and cognitive functions is one of science's grand challenges. The technical challenges that we face as we attempt to gain a systems-level understanding of the brain are manifold. The brain's structural complexity requires us to push the limit of imaging resolution and depth, while being able to cover large areas, resulting in enormous data acquisition and processing needs. Furthermore, it is necessary to detect functional activities and 'map' them onto the structural features. The functional activity occurs at multiple levels, using electrical and chemical signals. Certain electrical signals are only decipherable with sub-millisecond timescale resolution, while other modes of signals occur in minutes to hours. For these reasons, there is a wide consensus that new tools are necessary to undertake this daunting task. Optical techniques, due to their versatile and scalable nature, have great potentials to answer these challenges. Optical microscopy can now image beyond the diffraction limit, record multiple types of brain activity, and trace structural features across large areas of tissue. Genetically encoded molecular tools opened doors to controlling and detecting neural activity using light in specific cell types within the intact brain. Novel sample preparation methods that reduce light scattering have been developed, allowing whole brain imaging in rodent models. Adaptive optical methods have the potential to resolve images from deep brain regions. In this roadmap article, we showcase a few major advances in this area, survey the current challenges, and identify potential future needs that may be used as a guideline for the next steps to be taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.