ReviewLeukemia2017
Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia.
Review in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
141 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Prognostic value of measurable residual disease monitoring by next-generation sequencing before and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2021Trial
- Phase 1/2 trial of GCLAM with dose-escalated mitoxantrone for newly diagnosed AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms.Leukemia · 2018Trial
- Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Review
- Comparative and integrated application of flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing for minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Article
- Measurable residual mutated NPM1 before allogeneic transplant for acute myeloid leukemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Peri-transplant conundrums: optimizing maintenance therapy using MRD-directed approaches.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Monitoring of measurable residual disease by next-generation sequencing in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Measurable residual disease-guided therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: Practical insights.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- A Novel Approach to Prognostic Factors and Risk Stratification in Pediatric AML: Case Report and Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A machine learning approach for the rapid identification of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Functions, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications of noncoding RNA in acute myeloid leukemia.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- False-Positive and False-Negative MRD Results in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis (Brief Review and Clinical Experience).Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML Patients with Persistent Molecular MRD.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancing Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Pediatric BCP-ALL: Insights from Novel Immunophenotypic Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Breaking the Bone Marrow Barrier: Peripheral Blood as a Gateway to Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Impact of measurable residual disease clearance kinetics in patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy.Blood advances · 2025Article
81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There is considerable interest in developing techniques to detect and/or quantify remaining leukaemia cells termed measurable or, less precisely, minimal residual disease (MRD) in persons with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in complete remission defined by cytomorphological criteria. An important reason for AML MRD-testing is the possibility of estimating the likelihood (and timing) of leukaemia relapse. A perfect MRD-test would precisely quantify leukaemia cells biologically able and likely to cause leukaemia relapse within a defined interval. AML is genetically diverse and there is currently no uniform approach to detecting such cells. Several technologies focused on immune phenotype or cytogenetic and/or molecular abnormalities have been developed, each with advantages and disadvantages. Many studies report a positive MRD-test at diverse time points during AML therapy identifies persons with a higher risk of leukaemia relapse compared with those with a negative MRD-test even after adjusting for other prognostic and predictive variables. No MRD-test in AML has perfect sensitivity and specificity for relapse prediction at the cohort- or subject levels and there are substantial rates of false-positive and -negative tests. Despite these limitations, correlations between MRD-test results and relapse risk have generated interest in MRD-test result-directed therapy interventions. However, convincing proof that a specific intervention will reduce relapse risk in persons with a positive MRD-test is lacking and needs testing in randomized trials. Routine clinical use of MRD-testing requires further refinements and standardization/harmonization of assay platforms and results reporting. Such data are needed to determine whether results of MRD-testing can be used as a surrogate end point in AML therapy trials. This could make drug-testing more efficient and accelerate regulatory approvals. Although MRD-testing in AML has advanced substantially, much remains to be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.