ArticleScientific reports2017
Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical analysis of (Quasi-)Surprise for community detection in complex networks.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community or module structure is a natural property of complex networks. Leader communities and self-organizing communities have been introduced recently to characterize networks and understand how communities arise in complex networks. However, identification of leader and self-organizing communities is technically challenging since no adequate quantification has been developed to properly separate the two types of communities. We introduced a new measure, called ratio of node degree variances, to distinguish leader communities from self-organizing communities, and developed a statistical model to quantitatively characterize the two types of communities. We experimentally studied the power and robustness of the new method on several real-world networks in combination of some of the existing community identification methods. Our results revealed that social networks and citation networks contain more leader communities whereas technological networks such as power grid network have more self-organizing communities. Moreover, our results also indicated that self-organizing communities tend to be smaller than leader communities. The results shed new lights on community formation and module structures in complex systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.