Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28385709›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

Short template switch events explain mutation clusters in the human genome.

Ari Löytynoja, Nick Goldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Highly Recurrent Multinucleotide Mutations in SARS-CoV-2.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Generation of de novo miRNAs from template switching during DNA replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Revisiting mutagenesis at non-B DNA motifs in the human genome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  6. How to optimally sample a sequence for rapid analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  7. Finding Rearrangements in Nanopore DNA Reads with LAST and dnarrange.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Template switching in DNA replication can create and maintain RNA hairpins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ari LöytynojaInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5389-6611
Nick GoldmanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-2211
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resequencing efforts are uncovering the extent of genetic variation in humans and provide data to study the evolutionary processes shaping our genome. One recurring puzzle in both intra- and inter-species studies is the high frequency of complex mutations comprising multiple nearby base substitutions or insertion-deletions. We devised a generalized mutation model of template switching during replication that extends existing models of genome rearrangement and used this to study the role of template switch events in the origin of short mutation clusters. Applied to the human genome, our model detects thousands of template switch events during the evolution of human and chimp from their common ancestor and hundreds of events between two independently sequenced human genomes. Although many of these are consistent with a template switch mechanism previously proposed for bacteria, our model also identifies new types of mutations that create short inversions, some flanked by paired inverted repeats. The local template switch process can create numerous complex mutation patterns, including hairpin loop structures, and explains multinucleotide mutations and compensatory substitutions without invoking positive selection, speculative mechanisms, or implausible coincidence. Clustered sequence differences are challenging for current mapping and variant calling methods, and we show that many erroneous variant annotations exist in human reference data. Local template switch events may have been neglected as an explanation for complex mutations because of biases in commonly used analyses. Incorporation of our model into reference-based analysis pipelines and comparisons of de novo assembled genomes will lead to improved understanding of genome variation and evolution.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanINDEL MutationInverted Repeat SequencesModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBase SequenceBiological EvolutionHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPan troglodytesSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID28385709
PMCPMC5453318
OpenAlexW2949311060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.