Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28385680›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Connecting Families to Their Health Record and Care Team: The Use, Utility, and Impact of a Client/Family Health Portal at a Children's Rehabilitation Hospital.

Gillian King, Joanne Maxwell, Amir Karmali, Simon Hagens, Madhu Pinto, Laura Williams, Keith Adamson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian KingBloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-1217
Joanne MaxwellDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6849-1403
Amir KarmaliHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5229-976X
Simon HagensCanada Health Infoway, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-4380
Madhu PintoBloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-0493
Laura WilliamsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3397-021X
Keith AdamsonHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-884X
University of Toronto · CAHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital · CACanada Health Infoway · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care portals have the potential to provide consumers with timely, transparent access to health care information and engage them in the care process.

objectiveThe objective was to examine the use, utility, and impact on engagement in care and caregiver-provider communication of a client/family portal providing access to electronic health records (EHRs) and secure, 2-way e-messaging with care providers.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, mixed-methods study involving collection of caregivers' portal usage information over a 14-month period (from portal introduction in January 2015 to the end of the study period in March 2016), a Web-based survey for caregivers administered after a minimum of 2 months' exposure to the portal and repeated 2 months later, and focus groups or individual interviews held with caregivers and service providers at the same points in time. The survey assessed caregivers' perceptions of the utility of and satisfaction with the EHR and e-messaging, and the portal's impact on client engagement and perceptions of caregiver-provider communication. A total of 18 caregivers (parents) completed surveys and 6 also took part in focus groups or interviews. In addition, 5 service providers from different disciplines took part in focus groups or interviews.

resultsAlthough usage patterns varied, the typical pattern was a steady level of use (2.5 times a month over an average of 9 months), which is higher than typically reported use. The portal pages most frequently accessed were the home page, health record main page, appointment main page, and reports main page. The Web-based survey captured caregivers' perceptions of usefulness of and satisfaction with the EHR and portal messaging, as well as the portal's impact on their engagement in care and perceptions of caregiver-provider communication. The surveys indicated a moderate degree of utility of and satisfaction with the portal features, and a low but emerging impact on engagement in care and caregiver-provider communication (survey scales measuring these outcomes displayed excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach alpha ranging from .89 to .95). Qualitative themes from focus groups and interviews supported and extended the survey findings. Caregivers and service providers saw appreciable information benefits and provided recommendations to increase portal use and utility. Caregivers focused on the scope of organizational adoption of the portal system and indicated their hopes for the future of the portal, whereas service providers were concerned about how to best manage their investment of time and effort in preparing client-friendly reports and messaging clients via the portal.

conclusionsOverall, the findings show the promise of the portal and the need for ongoing evaluation to show the portal's ultimate potential in enhancing engagement in care and communication with care providers.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient PortalsAdultCaregiversCommunicationFamily HealthFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsProspective StudiesRehabilitation CentersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcaregiverschildren with disabilitiesdisabilityelectronic health recordsengagementhealth informationpatient portals

Identifiers

PMID28385680
PMCPMC5399217
OpenAlexW2605267557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.