Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28385517›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2017

Beyond Fourier.

Jeffrey C Hoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. XLSY: Extra-Large NMR Spectroscopy.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeffrey C HochDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT 06030-3305, USA. Electronic address: hoch@uchc.edu.

Funding

TRD3 NMRbox: Bayesian AnalyticsP41GM111135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2015 to 2024
$14.0M
Signal processing software for biomolecular NMRR01RR020125 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2005 to 2008
$1.2M
Maximum Entropy Deconvolution for Resolution & Sensitivity Enhancement in Bio-NMRR21GM104517 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2013 to 2014
$437k
Random Phase Detection for Accelerating Biomolecular NMR ExperimentsR21GM102366 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2013 to 2014
$422k
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR020125NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM111135NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM102366NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM104517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-Fourier methods of spectrum analysis are gaining traction in NMR spectroscopy, driven by their utility for processing nonuniformly sampled data. These methods afford new opportunities for optimizing experiment time, resolution, and sensitivity of multidimensional NMR experiments, but they also pose significant challenges not encountered with the discrete Fourier transform. A brief history of non-Fourier methods in NMR serves to place different approaches in context. Non-Fourier methods reflect broader trends in the growing importance of computation in NMR, and offer insights for future software development.

Indexed as

Fourier AnalysisAlgorithmsComputersData Interpretation, StatisticalMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareNon-FourierNonuniform samplingSpectrum analysis

Identifiers

PMID28385517
PMCPMC5730986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.