Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28385352›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2017

Neurokinin 3 receptor antagonism as a novel treatment for menopausal hot flushes: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Julia K Prague, Rachel E Roberts, Alexander N Comninos, Sophie Clarke, Channa N Jayasena, Zachary Nash, Chedie Doyle, Deborah A Papadopoulou, Stephen R Bloom, Pharis Mohideen and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02668185 phase2completednot on this map

Neurokinin 3 Receptor Antagonism as a Novel Treatment for Menopausal Hot Flushes

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2016 to 2017Enrolled37ConditionsMenopausal FlushingArmsNK3R antagonist - AZD4901, Placebo
NCT07042516 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Asimadoline (TP0052), a Peripherally Restricted Selective Kappa Agonist, for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Menopausal Symptoms in Midlife Women.

TypeinterventionalSponsorTioga PharmaceuticalsRan2025 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsVasomotor SymptomsArmsAsimadoline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Variation in menopausal vasomotor symptoms outcomes in clinical trials: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia K PragueDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rachel E RobertsDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alexander N ComninosDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sophie ClarkeDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Channa N JayasenaDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Zachary NashDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Chedie DoyleDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Deborah A PapadopoulouDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Stephen R BloomDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Pharis MohideenMillendo Therapeutics, Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nicholas PanayDepartment of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK; Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Myra S HunterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Johannes D VeldhuisMayo Clinic, Rochester, MI, USA.
Lorraine C WebberScientific Partnering & Alliances, Innovative Medicines and Early Development Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Melbourn, UK.
Les HusonDivision of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Waljit S DhilloDepartment of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: w.dhillo@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBKing's College London · GBMayo Clinic · USQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701679Medical Research Council MR/M024954/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHot flushes affect 70% of menopausal women and often severely impact physical, psychosocial, sexual, and overall wellbeing. Hormone replacement therapy is effective but is not without risk. Neurokinin B signalling is increased in menopausal women, and has been implicated as an important mediator of hot flushes.

methodsThis phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre, crossover trial assessed the effectiveness of an oral neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist (MLE4901) on menopausal hot flushes. Eligible participants were healthy women aged 40-62 years, having seven or more hot flushes in every 24 h of which some were reported as being severe or bothersome, who had not had a menstrual period for at least 12 months, and who had not been taking any medication shown to improve menopausal flushes in the preceding 8 weeks. Participants received 4 weeks of MLE4901 (40 mg, orally, twice daily) and placebo (orally, twice daily) in random order separated by a 2 week washout period. Randomisation was completed by a central computer, and participants were allocated to treatment number in numerical order. The primary outcome was the total number of hot flushes during the final week of both treatment periods. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol using generalised linear mixed models and standard crossover analysis. All analyses were prespecified in the study protocol. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02668185.

findings68 women were screened between Feb 3 and Oct 10, 2016, of which 37 were randomly assigned and included in an intention-to-treat analysis. 28 participants completed the trial and were included in a per-protocol analysis. MLE4901 significantly reduced the total weekly number of hot flushes by 45 percentage points (95% CI 22-67) compared with the placebo (intention-to-treat adjusted means: placebo 49·01 [95% CI 40·81-58·56] vs MLE4901 19·35 [15·99-23·42]; adjusted estimate of difference 29·66 [17·39-42·87], p<0·0001). Treatment was well tolerated. Three participants developed a transaminase rise (alanine aminotransferase 4·5-5·9 times the upper limit of normal) with a normal bilirubin 28 days after starting MLE4901, which normalised within 90 days.

interpretationTreatment with a neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist (MLE4901) could be practice changing as it safely and effectively relieves hot flush symptoms without the need for oestrogen exposure. Larger scale studies of longer duration are now indicated.

fundingUK Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHot FlashesHumansMenopauseMiddle AgedReceptors, Neurokinin-3Treatment OutcomeReceptors, Neurokinin-3TACR3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28385352
PMCPMC5439024
OpenAlexW2604269555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.