Trial reportJAMA neurology2017
Serum C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Biomarker in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- C-reactive protein levels in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review.Brain and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Inflammatory checkpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: From biomarkers to therapeutic targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Phase 2B randomized controlled trial of NP001 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Pre-specified and post hoc analyses.Muscle & nerve · 2022Trial
- Tocilizumab is safe and tolerable and reduces C-reactive protein concentrations in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of ALS patients.Muscle & nerve · 2021Trial
- Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: an Original Study.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020Trial
- Sex-associated differences in routine inflammatory markers and neuromuscular ultrasound measurements in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: neuroinflammation and the dawn of precision medicine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Therapeutic Challenges and Future Breakthroughs in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From Precision Medicine to Innovative Trial Design.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brain communications · 2026Review
- Dietary Vitamin Intake and Blood Biomarkers in Relation to Muscle Activation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Evaluating the predictive potential of Th1 (IFN-γJournal of neurology · 2025Article
- Elevated Serum MCP-2 and TARC Associated With Increased Risk of Death in Guamanian ALS Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammation, Nutritional Status and Sarcopenia in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
- Lower creatinine-to-cystatin c ratio associated with increased risk of incident amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the prospective UK biobank cohort.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Elevated peripheral inflammation is associated with choroid plexus enlargement in independent sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cohorts.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2024Article
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Insights and New Prospects in Disease Pathophysiology, Biomarkers and Therapies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prognostic Clinical and Biological Markers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease Progression: Validation and Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Review
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Various factors have been proposed as possible candidates associated with the prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, there is still no consensus on which biomarkers are reliable prognostic factors. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker of the inflammatory response that shows significant prognostic value for several diseases. Objective: To examine the prognostic significance of CRP in ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients' serum CRP levels were evaluated from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2015, in a large cohort of patients with ALS observed by an Italian tertiary multidisciplinary center. Results were replicated in an independent cohort obtained from a population-based registry of patients with ALS. A post hoc analysis was performed of the phase 2 trial of NP001 to determine whether stratification by levels of CRP improves differentiation of responders and nonresponders to the drug. Main Outcomes and Measures: Serum CRP levels from the first examination were recorded to assess their effect on disease progression and survival. Results: A total of 394 patients with ALS (168 women and 226 men; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.18 [13.60] years) were observed in a tertiary multidisciplinary center, and the analysis was replicated in an independent cohort of 116 patients with ALS (50 women and 66 men; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.00 [10.74] years) identified through a regional population-based registry. Serum CRP levels in the 394 patients with ALS correlated with severity of functional impairment, as measured by total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, at first evaluation (r = -0.14818; P = .004), and with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.129; 95% CI, 1.033-1.234; P = .007). Similar results were found in the independent cohort (hazard ratio, 1.044; 95% CI, 1.016-1.056; P ≤ .001). Moreover, a post hoc analysis of the phase 2 trial of NP001 using the same CRP threshold showed that patients with elevated baseline CRP levels receiving the higher dose of NP001 had significantly less functional impairment after the treatment period compared with patients with normal baseline CRP, regardless of whether patients with normal CRP levels received NP001 or placebo (3.00 [3.62] vs -7.31 [6.23]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that patients with ALS and elevated serum CRP levels progress more rapidly than do those with lower CRP levels and that this elevation may reflect a neuroinflammatory state potentially responsive to the immune regulators such as NP001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.