Trial reportJAMA oncology2017
Metronomic Chemotherapy vs Best Supportive Care in Progressive Pediatric Solid Malignant Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01858571 (Low Dose Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Low Dose Chemotherapy (Metronomic Therapy) Versus Best Supportive Care in Progressive and/or Refractory Pediatric Malignancies: a Double Blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Study
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Extraocular Retinoblastoma: ICMR Consensus Guidelines.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Guideline
- Metronomic chemotherapy for paediatric extracranial solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Pooled it
- Time-dependent treatment effects of metronomic chemotherapy in unfit AML patients: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.BMC research notes · 2021Trial
- Survey of pediatric solid tumor care in economically underdeveloped regions of China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Understanding and Overcoming Osteosarcoma Heterogeneity.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Cyclophosphamide and Topotecan in Relapsed and Refractory Pediatric Extracranial Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- Effect of PERMA-based psychological intervention and predictive care in malignant tumor patients following chemotherapy.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Decoding the immune landscape in Ewing sarcoma pathogenesis: The role of tumor infiltrating immune cells and immune milieu.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Metronomic chemotherapy in pediatric neuroblastoma.Pediatric discovery · 2024Review
- A real-world study on the clinicopathological profile, treatment outcomes and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among patients with desmoid tumor at two tertiary care centers in India.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Controversies and Challenges in the Management of Osteosarcoma-an Indian Perspective.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- Metronomic Chemotherapy in Pediatric Oncology: From Preclinical Evidence to Clinical Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Outcomes of Ewing sarcoma in adults over 40 years of age from a low-middle income country.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Pediatric Patients With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Leiomyosarcoma of urinary bladder with unusual recurrence in intestinal mucosa and peritoneum: a case report.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- The frequency of medical reversals in a cross-sectional analysis of high-impact oncology journals, 2009-2018.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Metronomic Therapy in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Metronomic Chemotherapy.Cancers · 2021Review
- Adapting Management of Sarcomas in COVID-19: An Evidence-Based Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceAlthough oral metronomic chemotherapy is often used in progressive pediatric solid malignant tumors, a literature review reveals that only small single-arm retrospective or phase 1 and 2 studies have been performed. Skepticism abounds because of the lack of level 1 evidence.
objectivesTo compare the effect of metronomic chemotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) with that of placebo in pediatric patients with primary extracranial, nonhematopoietic solid malignant tumors that progress after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015, at the cancer center at All India Institute of Medical Sciences in children aged 5 to 18 years with primary extracranial, nonhematopoietic solid malignant tumors that progressed after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy and had no further curative options.
interventionsOne arm received a 4-drug oral metronomic regimen of daily celecoxib and thalidomide with alternating periods of etoposide and cyclophosphamide, whereas the other arm received placebo. Disease status was assessed at baseline, 9 weeks, 18 weeks, and 27 weeks or at clinical progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was PFS as defined by the proportion of patients without disease progression at 6 months, and PFS duration and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points.
resultsA total of 108 of the 123 patients screened were enrolled, with 52 randomized to the placebo group (median age, 15 years; 40 male [76.9%]) and 56 to the metronomic chemotherapy group (median age, 13 years; 42 male [75.0%]). At a median follow-up of 2.9 months, 100% of the patients had disease progression by 6 months in the placebo group vs 96.4% in the metronomic chemotherapy group (P = .24). Median PFS and OS in the 2 groups was similar (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-1.03 [P = .07] for PFS; and HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09 [P = .13] for OS). In post hoc subgroup analysis, cohorts receiving more than 3 cycles (HR for PFS, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.93; P = .03) and those without a bone sarcoma (ie, neither primitive neuroectodermal tumor nor osteosarcoma) (HR for PFS, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .01) appeared to benefit from metronomic chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Metronomic chemotherapy does not improve 6-month PFS, compared with placebo, among pediatric patients with extracranial progressive solid malignant tumors . However, patients without bone sarcoma and those able to tolerate therapy for more than 3 cycles (9 weeks) benefit.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01858571.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.