ArticlePloS one2017
Differential CLE peptide perception by plant receptors implicated from structural and functional analyses of TDIF-TDR interactions.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- An updated history of TDIF-PXY signalling: a study in cell fate and tissue patterning.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Diversification of CLE expression patterns and nonmeristematic roles for CLAVATA receptor-like kinases in a moss.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Macromolecular tool box to elucidate CLAVATA3/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGION-RELATED-RLK binding, signaling, and downstream effects.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Evolutionary conservation of receptor compensation for stem cell homeostasis in Solanaceae plants.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- CLAVATA signaling in plant-environment interactions.Plant physiology · 2024Review
- A novel toolbox to record CLE peptide signaling.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Dynamic evolution of small signalling peptide compensation in plant stem cell control.Nature plants · 2022Article
- HSL1 and BAM1/2 impact epidermal cell development by sensing distinct signaling peptides.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Processing and Formation of Bioactive CLE40 Peptide Are Controlled by Posttranslational Proline Hydroxylation.Plant physiology · 2020Article
- Expression, purification, and phylogenetic analysis of MDIS1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE1 (MIK1).The protein journal · 2020Article
- Plant Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinase (LRR-RK): Structure, Ligand Perception, and Activation Mechanism.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Modifying Baculovirus Expression Vectors to Produce Secreted Plant Proteins in Insect Cells.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- The Extracellular Domain of Pollen Receptor Kinase 3 is structurally similar to the SERK family of co-receptors.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheary Element Differentiation Inhibitory Factor (TDIF) belongs to the family of post-translationally modified CLE (CLAVATA3/embryo surrounding region (ESR)-related) peptide hormones that control root growth and define the delicate balance between stem cell proliferation and differentiation in SAM (shoot apical meristem) or RAM (root apical meristem). In Arabidopsis, Tracheary Element Differentiation Inhibitory Factor Receptor (TDR) and its ligand TDIF signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of procambial cell proliferation and inhibiting its differentiation into xylem cells. Here we present the crystal structures of the extracellular domains (ECD) of TDR alone and in complex with its ligand TDIF resolved at 2.65 Ǻ and 2.75 Ǻ respectively. These structures provide insights about the ligand perception and specific interactions between the CLE peptides and their cognate receptors. Our in vitro biochemical studies indicate that the interactions between the ligands and the receptors at the C-terminal anchoring site provide conserved binding. While the binding interactions occurring at the N-terminal anchoring site dictate differential binding specificities between different ligands and receptors. Our studies will open different unknown avenues of TDR-TDIF signaling pathways that will enhance our knowledge in this field highlighting the receptor ligand interaction, receptor activation, signaling network, modes of action and will serve as a structure function relationship model between the ligand and the receptor for various similar leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.