Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28384301›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Effects of cognitive bias modification on social anxiety: A meta-analysis.

Haining Liu, Xianwen Li, Buxin Han, Xiaoqian Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07753538 (Computerized Interpretation Bias Modification Training for Social Anxiety Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07753538 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Computerized Interpretation Bias Modification Training for Social Anxiety Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsSocial Anxiety Disorder (SAD)ArmsInterpretation Bias Modification Training, Stress Management Psychoeducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brazilian Psychiatric Association guidelines for the treatment of social anxiety disorder.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal patterns of loneliness and their associations with mental health outcomes: Observations from a longitudinal study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions, Social Anxiety, and Sexual Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neural correlates of cognitive bias modification for interpretation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haining LiuKey Lab of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xianwen LiSchool of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Buxin HanKey Lab of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqian LiuKey Lab of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive bias modification (CBM), a set of techniques for modifying bias in information processing-is considered a novel intervention for social anxiety disorder (SAD), which has drawn considerable interest from researchers. However, the effects of CBM on SAD are not consistent. Some studies have demonstrated significant positive effects compared to control groups, while others have found no such effects.

aimsWe conducted a meta-analysis aimed at quantitatively assessing the effects of CBM on SAD at post-test.

methodThrough a systematic literature search by two independent raters, 34 articles (36 randomized studies) including 2,550 participants were identified. A multilevel modeling approach was employed to assess the effects of CBM on SAD, and to explore the potentially crucial procedures and sample characteristics that enhance the effectiveness of benign training.

resultsIn general, there were small but significant effects of CBM on the primary symptoms of SAD (g = 0.17), cognitive bias (CB) toward threat (g = 0.32), and reactivity in stressful situations (g = 0.25), but non-significant effects on secondary symptoms. However, the interpretation modification program was more effective than was attentional bias modification in reducing SAD primary symptoms and negative CB. Laboratory training procedures produced larger primary symptom reductions compared to Internet-based training, whereas the percentage of contingency and feedback about training performance boosted cognitive effects only. Finally, the following groups were more likely to benefit from CBM: younger participants (primary symptoms and cognitive effects), women (primary symptom effects), and samples with stronger CB (stressor effects). The quality of the randomized controlled trials was less than desirable, as there was some indication of publication bias in our study.

conclusionsCurrent findings broadly supported cognitive theories of SAD that consider a bidirectional or mutually reinforcing relationship between symptoms and CBs. However, the small therapeutic effect observed here indicates that it is necessary to develop more reliable and efficient CBM interventions that are specific to SAD.

Indexed as

CognitionPhobia, SocialHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28384301
PMCPMC5383070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.