Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28384139›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2017

Antifungal drug testing by combining minimal inhibitory concentration testing with target identification by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Christoph Müller, Ulrike Binder, Franz Bracher, Martin Giera

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The molecular basis of intrinsic resistance to azoles inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  9. mSphere · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Biosynthesis of lanosterol inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Ergosterol-depleted clinical isolates ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. mBio · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Lipidomic Signatures inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Christoph MüllerDepartment of Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ulrike BinderDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Division of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Franz BracherDepartment of Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin GieraDepartment of Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal infections and their increasing resistance to antibiotics are an emerging threat to public health. Novel antifungal drugs, as well technologies that can help us bolster the antimicrobial pipeline and understand resistance mechanisms, are needed. The ergosterol biosynthetic pathway is one potential target for antifungal drugs. Here we describe how antifungal susceptibility testing can be combined with target identification in distal ergosterol biosynthesis by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The fungi are treated with sublethal doses of active components that block ergosterol biosynthesis, and the ergosterol biosynthesis intermediates are analyzed in a targeted metabolomics manner after derivatization (trimethylsilylation). Drug treatment results in distinct sterol patterns that are characteristic of the affected enzyme. Sterol identification based on relative retention times and electron ionization (EI) mass spectra, as well as semiquantitative assessment of ergosterol intermediates, is described. The protocol is applicable to yeasts and molds. The overall analysis time from incubation to test result is not more than 3 d. The assay can be used to determine whether an antifungal compound of interest targets sterol biosynthesis, and, if so, to determine which enzyme in the pathway it targets.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiosynthetic PathwaysErgosterolFungiGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsErgosterol

Identifiers

PMID28384139
OpenAlexW2604701675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.