Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28384085›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2017

An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation.

C Hendricks Brown, Geoffrey Curran, Lawrence A Palinkas, Gregory A Aarons, Kenneth B Wells, Loretta Jones, Linda M Collins, Naihua Duan, Brian S Mittman, Andrea Wallace and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 270 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Screening and Interventions for Elder Mistreatment: Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0 Systematic Review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Motivational interviewing plus behavioral activation for alcohol misuse in college students with ADHD.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

C Hendricks BrownDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611; email: hendricks.brown@northwestern.edu.
Geoffrey CurranDivision of Health Services Research, Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205; email: currangeoffreym@uams.edu.
Lawrence A PalinkasDepartment of Children, Youth and Families, School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089; email: palinkas@usc.edu.
Gregory A AaronsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California 92093; email: gaarons@ucsd.edu.
Kenneth B WellsCenter for Health Services and Society, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024; email: KWells@mednet.ucla.edu.
Loretta JonesHealthy African American Families, Los Angeles, California 90008; email: lorettajones@haafii.org.
Linda M CollinsThe Methodology Center and Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; email: lmcollins@psu.edu.
Naihua DuanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; email: naihuaduan@gmail.com.
Brian S MittmanVA Center for Implementation Practice and Research Support, Virginia Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, California 91343; email: Brian.Mittman@va.gov.
Andrea WallaceCollege of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; email: andrea-wallace@uiowa.edu.
Rachel G TabakPrevention Research Center, George Warren Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63105; email: rtabak@wustl.edu.
Lori DucharmeNational Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; email: lori.ducharme@nih.gov.
David A ChambersDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850; email: dchamber@mail.nih.gov , netagil@mail.nih.gov.
Gila NetaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850; email: dchamber@mail.nih.gov , netagil@mail.nih.gov.
Tisha WileyNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; email: wileytr@nida.nih.gov.
John LandsverkOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, Oregon 97401; email: jlandsverk@aol.com.
Ken CheungMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032; email: kencheung2@gmail.com.
Gracelyn CrudenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611; email: hendricks.brown@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
INNOVATIVE IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH METHODS COREP30DA027828 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BROWN, C. HENDRICKS, MUSTANSKI, BRIAN · 2011 to 2020
$11.4M
Translational Drug Abuse Prevention CenterP50DA035763 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI CHAMBERLAIN, PATRICIA, FISHER, PHILIP A · 2013 to 2017
$9.5M
Mixed-Methods Study of EBP Sustainment in a Statewide Service SystemR01MH072961 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AARONS, GREGORY · 2005 to 2016
$5.8M
Community Development Teams to Scale-Up MTFC in CaliforniaR01MH076158 · NIMH · CENTER FOR RESEARCH TO PRACTICE, INC. · PI CHAMBERLAIN, PATRICIA · 2006 to 2011
$5.7M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA027828NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA035763NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH072961NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. This article is one product of a design workgroup that was formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. This article emphasizes randomized and nonrandomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsResearch DesignEvidence-Based MedicineHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadaptationadoptionfidelityimplementation trialscale upsustainment

Identifiers

PMID28384085
PMCPMC5384265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.