Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28384078›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2017

Risk of Second Cancer in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors and Influence of Family History.

Amit Sud, Hauke Thomsen, Kristina Sundquist, Richard S Houlston, Kari Hemminki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit SudAmit Sud and Richard S. Houlston, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Hauke Thomsen and Kari Hemminki, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; and Kristina Sundquist and Kari Hemminki, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Hauke ThomsenAmit Sud and Richard S. Houlston, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Hauke Thomsen and Kari Hemminki, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; and Kristina Sundquist and Kari Hemminki, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kristina SundquistAmit Sud and Richard S. Houlston, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Hauke Thomsen and Kari Hemminki, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; and Kristina Sundquist and Kari Hemminki, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Richard S HoulstonAmit Sud and Richard S. Houlston, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Hauke Thomsen and Kari Hemminki, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; and Kristina Sundquist and Kari Hemminki, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kari HemminkiAmit Sud and Richard S. Houlston, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Hauke Thomsen and Kari Hemminki, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; and Kristina Sundquist and Kari Hemminki, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK A15116Cancer Research UK A3351Cancer Research UK A4646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Although advances in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment have led to improved disease-free survival, this has been accompanied by an increased risk of second cancers. We sought to quantify the second cancer risks and to investigate the impact of family history. Patients and Methods Using the Swedish Family-Cancer Project Database, we identified 9,522 individuals with primary HL diagnosed between 1965 and 2012. We calculated standardized incidence ratios and cumulative incidence of second cancer in HL survivors and compared the standardized incidence ratios of lung, breast, colorectal, and all second cancers in HL survivors with and without a site-specific family history of cancer. Interactions between family history of cancer and HL treatment were evaluated under additive and multiplicative models. Results Overall, the risk of a second cancer in HL survivors was increased 2.39-fold (95% CI, 2.29 to 2.53). The 30-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer in women diagnosed with HL at younger than 35 years of age was 13.8%. We observed no significant difference in cancer risk over successive time periods. The risk of all second cancers was 1.3-fold higher for HL survivors with a first-degree relative with cancer ( P < .001), with 3.3-fold, 2.1-fold, and 1.8-fold differences shown for lung, colorectal, and breast cancers, respectively. Moreover, a greater than additive interaction between family history of lung cancer and HL treatment was shown ( P = .03). Conclusion HL survivorship is associated with a substantive risk of a second cancer. Notably, the risk is higher in individuals with a family history of cancer. This information should be used to inform risk-adapted therapy and to assist in screening to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with HL.

Indexed as

Medical History TakingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHodgkin DiseaseHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID28384078
PMCPMC5455705
OpenAlexW2603628708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.