Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28383955›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2017

Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later.

Shaney Flores, Heather R Bailey, Michelle L Eisenberg, Jeffrey M Zacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Narrative coherence warps the timeline of recalled naturalistic events.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Event Segmentation Interventions Improve Memory for Naturalistic Events.Current directions in psychological science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaney FloresDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0003-2726-8704
Heather R BaileyDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
Michelle L EisenbergDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
Jeffrey M ZacksDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.

Funding

ENCODING AND REMEMBERING EVENTS ACROSS THE LIFE SPANR01AG031150 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZACKS, JEFFREY M · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When people observe everyday activity, they spontaneously parse it into discrete meaningful events. Individuals who segment activity in a more normative fashion show better subsequent memory for the events. If segmenting events effectively leads to better memory, does asking people to attend to segmentation improve subsequent memory? To answer this question, participants viewed movies of naturalistic activity with instructions to remember the activity for a later test, and in some conditions additionally pressed a button to segment the movies into meaningful events or performed a control condition that required button-pressing but not attending to segmentation. In 5 experiments, memory for the movies was assessed at intervals ranging from immediately following viewing to 1 month later. Performing the event segmentation task led to superior memory at delays ranging from 10 min to 1 month. Further, individual differences in segmentation ability predicted individual differences in memory performance for up to a month following encoding. This study provides the first evidence that manipulating event segmentation affects memory over long delays and that individual differences in event segmentation are related to differences in memory over long delays. These effects suggest that attending to how an activity breaks down into meaningful events contributes to memory formation. Instructing people to more effectively segment events may serve as a potential intervention to alleviate everyday memory complaints in aging and clinical populations. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

MemoryAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionMotion PicturesPsychological TestsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28383955
PMCPMC5542882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.