Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28383938›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition2017

Familiarity-based stimulus generalization of conditioned suppression.

Jasper Robinson, Emma J Whitt, Peter M Jones

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Strawman argument characterises critique of Kamin blocking effect.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasper RobinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-5162
Emma J WhittSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham.
Peter M JonesSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C006283/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report that stimulus novelty/familiarity is able to modulate stimulus generalization and discuss the theoretical implications of novelty/familiarity coding. Rats in Skinner boxes received clicker → shock pairings before generalization testing to a tone. Before clicker training, different groups of rats received preexposure treatments designed to systematically modulate the clicker and the tone's novelty and familiarity. Rats whose preexposure matched novelty/familiarity (i.e., either both or neither clicker and tone were preexposed) showed enhanced suppression to the tone relative to rats whose preexposure mixed novelty/familiarity (i.e., only clicker or tone was preexposed). This was not the result of sensory preconditioning to clicker and tone. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalGeneralization, StimulusAnimalsConditioning, PsychologicalRatsRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID28383938
PMCPMC5410874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.