Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28383543›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017

Autozygosity reveals recessive mutations and novel mechanisms in dominant genes: implications in variant interpretation.

Dorota Monies, Sateesh Maddirevula, Wesam Kurdi, Mohammed H Alanazy, Hisham Alkhalidi, Mohammed Al-Owain, Raashda A Sulaiman, Eissa Faqeih, Ewa Goljan, Niema Ibrahim and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Macrophages in embryonic development.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Homozygous mutation inBioImpacts : BI · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Robots as models of evolving systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorota MoniesDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-6799
Sateesh MaddirevulaDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wesam KurdiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7958-8123
Mohammed H AlanazyDepartment of Internal Medicine, King Saud University Medical City and College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5177-8283
Hisham AlkhalidiDepartment of Pathology, King Saud University Medical City and College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7094-5646
Mohammed Al-OwainDepartment of Medical Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raashda A SulaimanDepartment of Medical Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-9823
Eissa FaqeihDepartment of Pediatric Subspecialties, Children's Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ewa GoljanDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Niema IbrahimDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Firdous AbdulwahabDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mais HashemDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed AbouelhodaDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ranad ShaheenDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2590-1759
Stefan T AroldComputational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, audi Arabia.
Fowzan S AlkurayaDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAAlfaisal University · SAKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SAKing Saud Medical City · SABioscience Research · USKing Fahd Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to describe recessive alleles in strictly dominant genes. Identifying recessive mutations in genes for which only dominant disease or risk alleles have been reported can expand our understanding of the medical relevance of these genes both phenotypically and mechanistically. The Saudi population is enriched for autozygosity, which enhances the homozygous occurrence of alleles, including pathogenic alleles in genes that have been associated only with a dominant inheritance pattern.

methodsExome sequencing of patients from consanguineous families with likely recessive phenotypes was performed. In one family, the genotype of the deceased children was inferred from their parents due to lack of available samples.

resultsWe describe the identification of 11 recessive variants (5 of which are reported here for the first time) in 11 genes for which only dominant disease or risk alleles have been reported. The observed phenotypes for these recessive variants were novel (e.g., FBN2-related myopathy and CSF1R-related brain malformation and osteopetrosis), typical (e.g., ACTG2-related visceral myopathy), or an apparently healthy state (e.g., PDE11A), consistent with the corresponding mouse knockout phenotypes.

conclusionOur results show that, in the era of genomic sequencing and "reverse phenotyping," recessive variants in dominant genes should not be dismissed based on perceived "incompatibility" with the patient's phenotype before careful consideration.Genet Med advance online publication 06 April 2017.

Indexed as

AllelesBase SequenceChildChromosome MappingConsanguinityExomeExome SequencingFemaleGene FrequencyGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenetic VariationHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28383543
OpenAlexW2605316851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.