Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28383531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Microbial community response to hydration-desiccation cycles in desert soil.

Adam Šťovíček, Minsu Kim, Dani Or, Osnat Gillor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel endolithic bacteria of phylumApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Soil viral diversity, ecology and climate change.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How Microbes Evolved to Tolerate Oxygen.Trends in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam ŠťovíčekBen Gurion University of the Negev Sede Boqer Campus, Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Beer Sheva, 84990, Israel.
Minsu KimSoil and Terrestrial Environmental Physics (STEP), Department of Environmental Systems Sciences (USYS), ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Dani OrSoil and Terrestrial Environmental Physics (STEP), Department of Environmental Systems Sciences (USYS), ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Osnat GillorBen Gurion University of the Negev Sede Boqer Campus, Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Beer Sheva, 84990, Israel.

Funding

European Research Council 320499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life in desert soil is marked by episodic pulses of water and nutrients followed by long periods of drought. While the desert flora and fauna flourish after rainfall the response of soil microorganisms remains unclear and understudied. We provide the first systematic study of the role of soil aqueous habitat dynamics in shaping microbial community composition and diversity. Detailed monitoring of natural microbial communities after a rainfall event revealed a remarkable decrease in diversity and a significant transition in community composition that were gradually restored to pre-rainfall values during soil desiccation. Modelling results suggest a critical role for the fragmented aqueous habitat in maintaining microbial diversity under dry soil conditions and diversity loss with wetting events that increase connectivity among habitats. This interdisciplinary study provides new insights into wetting and drying processes that promote and restore the unparalleled microbial diversity found in soil.

Identifiers

PMID28383531
PMCPMC5382909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.