Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28383465›Full record

ReviewOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2017

Emerging Therapies for Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Matthew Gordon Crowson, Ronna Hertzano, Debara L Tucci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. HNO-Nachrichten · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Gene Therapy to the Retina and the Cochlea.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew Gordon Crowson*Division of Head & Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina †Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Anatomy and Neurobiology and Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ronna Hertzano
Debara L Tucci
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT NONSYNDROMIC HEARING LOSSR01DC003544 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SMITH, RICHARD J.H. · 1998 to 2017
$7.8M
Cell Type Specific Transcriptional Cascades in Inner Ear DevelopmentR01DC013817 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HERTZANO, RONNA · 2015 to 2022
$3.6M
Cell Type Specific Transcriptional Cascades in Inner Ear DevelopmentU01DC013817 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI AHMED, ZUBAIR M. · 2023 to 2025
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003544NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013817NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC013817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo critically review and evaluate the proposed mechanisms and documented results of the therapeutics currently in active clinical drug trials for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. DATA SOURCES: US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Trials registry, MEDLINE/PubMed. STUDY SELECTION & DATA EXTRACTION: A review of the NIH Clinical Trials registry identified candidate hearing loss therapies, and supporting publications were acquired from MEDLINE/PubMed. Proof-of-concept, therapeutic mechanisms, and clinical outcomes were critically appraised. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-two active clinical drug trials registered in the United States were identified, and six potentially therapeutic molecules were reviewed. Of the six molecules reviewed, four comprised mechanisms pertaining to mitigating oxidative stress pathways that presumably lead to inner ear cell death. One remaining therapy sought to manipulate the cell death cascade, and the last remaining therapy was a novel cell replacement therapy approach to introduce a transcription factor that promotes hair cell regeneration.

conclusionA common theme in recent clinical trials registered in the United States appears to be the targeting of cell death pathways and influence of oxidant stressors on cochlear sensory neuroepithelium. In addition, a virus-delivered cell replacement therapy would be the first of its kind should it prove safe and efficacious. Significant challenges for bringing these bench-to-bedside therapies to market remain. It is never assured that results in non-human animal models translate to effective therapies in the setting of human biology. Moreover, as additional processes are described in association with hearing loss, such as an immune response and loss of synaptic contacts, additional pathways for targeting become available.

Indexed as

AnimalsHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansOtolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID28383465
PMCPMC5465007
OpenAlexW2604599713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.