Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382802›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2017

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2016: 10-year special edition.

Dong Hoon Suh, Miseon Kim, Kidong Kim, Hak Jae Kim, Kyung Hun Lee, Jae Weon Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong Hoon SuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4312-966X
Miseon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-9275
Kidong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-6024
Hak Jae KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-2263
Kyung Hun LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2390-3240
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kjwksh@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, 13 topics were selected as major research advances in gynecologic oncology. For ovarian cancer, study results supporting previous ones regarding surgical preventive strategies were reported. There were several targeted agents that showed comparable responses in phase III trials, including niraparib, cediranib, and nintedanib. On the contrary to our expectations, dose-dense weekly chemotherapy regimen failed to prove superior survival outcomes compared with conventional triweekly regimen. Single-agent non-platinum treatment to prolong platinum-free-interval in patients with recurrent, partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer did not improve and even worsened overall survival (OS). For cervical cancer, we reviewed robust evidences of larger-scaled population-based study and cost-effectiveness of nonavalent vaccine for expanding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage. Standard of care treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) was briefly reviewed. For uterine corpus cancer, new findings about appropriate surgical wait time from diagnosis to surgery were reported. Advantages of minimally invasive surgery over conventional laparotomy were reconfirmed. There were 5 new gene regions that increase the risk of developing endometrial cancer. Regarding radiation therapy, Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC)-3 quality of life (QOL) data were released and higher local control rate of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy was reported in LACC. In addition, 4 general oncology topics followed: chemotherapy at the end-of-life, immunotherapy with reengineering T-cells, actualization of precision medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI) to make personalized cancer therapy real. For breast cancer, adaptively randomized trials, extending aromatase inhibitor therapy, and ribociclib and palbociclib were introduced.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomedical ResearchBrachytherapyBreast NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineRadiotherapyRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedTerminal CareUterine Cervical NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleOvarian NeoplasmsPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID28382802
PMCPMC5391398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.