Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382794›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gynecologic oncology2017

Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Myong Cheol Lim, Maria Lee, Seung Hyuk Shim, Eun Ji Nam, Jung Yun Lee, Hyun Jung Kim, Yoo Young Lee, Kwang Beom Lee, Jeong Yeol Park, Yun Hwan Kim and 8 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of intracavitary brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcomes of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Chilean consensus of the Society of Radiation Oncology.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Myong Cheol LimGynecologic Cancer Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, and Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital and Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-7158
Maria LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8017-3176
Seung Hyuk ShimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-2257
Eun Ji NamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-3560
Jung Yun LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-1350
Hyun Jung KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Yoo Young LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Beom LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-176X
Jeong Yeol ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-7123
Yun Hwan KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-2938
Kyung Do KiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong Jung SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-2466
Hyun Hoon ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-7492
Sunghoon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-7473
Jeong Won LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-0398
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9436
Duk Soo BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Min LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kgo02@hanmail.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-5443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers have been developed by academic society from several countries. Each guideline reflected their own insurance system and unique medical environment, based on the published evidence. The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) published the first edition of practice guidelines for gynecologic cancer treatment in late 2006; the second edition was released in July 2010 as an evidence-based recommendation. The Guidelines Revision Committee was established in 2015 and decided to develop the third edition of the guidelines in an advanced format based on evidence-based medicine, embracing up-to-date clinical trials and qualified Korean data. These guidelines cover strategies for diagnosis and treatment of primary and recurrent cervical cancer. The committee members and many gynecologic oncologists derived key questions through discussions, and a number of relevant scientific literature were reviewed in advance. Recommendations for each specific question were developed by the consensus conference, and they are summarized here, along with the details. The objective of these practice guidelines is to establish standard policies on issues in clinical practice related to the management in cervical cancer based on the results in published papers to date and the consensus of experts as a KSGO Consensus Statement.

Indexed as

ConsensusAdenosarcomaFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialRepublic of KoreaSocieties, MedicalUterine Cervical NeoplasmsChemotherapyConsensusGeneral SurgeryIrradiationPractice GuidelineUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28382794
PMCPMC5391389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.