Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382572›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2017

Current Clinical Trials on the Use of Ceftaroline in the Pediatric Population.

Adam Corey, Tsz-Yin So

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  2. Methicillin-resistantThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  3. Management and Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Children.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam CoreyUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
Tsz-Yin SoDepartment of Pharmacy, Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, 1200 N. Elm St, Greensboro, NC, 27401, USA. Tsz-Yin.So@conehealth.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-6119
Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rate of antibiotic resistance in children continues to rise requiring the use of new antibiotics. Ceftaroline fosamil, a newer-generation cephalosporin, was recently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in children aged >2 months. Ceftaroline provides coverage against staphylococcal and streptococcal infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatric dosing differs from adult dosing, but it maintains a similar pharmacokinetic profile and offers similar efficacy in terms of time above the minimum inhibitory concentration as compared to the adult population. The clinical safety and efficacy of this antibiotic has been assessed in three pediatric clinical trials that led to its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, and each trial is described within this review. This article will also discuss the ongoing trials assessing the possibility of expanding the indications of this antibiotic to late-onset sepsis, meningitis and osteomyelitis in the pediatric population.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporinsChildCommunity-Acquired InfectionsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusSepsisStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID28382572
OpenAlexW2604723031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.