ArticleDrug safety2017
Drospirenone-Containing Oral Contraceptive Pills and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: An Assessment of Risk in First-Time Users and Restarters.
Article in Drug safety, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of reporting of drug exposure in pharmacoepidemiological studies.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2020Pooled it
- Drug-induced retinal vein occlusion: a disproportionality analysis from the FDA adverse event reporting system (2004-2023).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of drugs on venous thromboembolism risk in surgical patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Review
- The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE).BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe effects of drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain controversial due to the challenge in distinguishing between first-time users and restarters, and their different underlying VTE risks, in healthcare databases.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the challenge of studying the risk of VTE among first-time users of drospirenone-containing COCs in a healthcare database and assess the risk among first-time users and restarters.
methodsWe used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink to construct two cohorts. The first-time user cohort included all women aged 16-45 years who received a first ever prescription of drospirenone- or levonorgestrel-containing COCs between May 2002 and March 2015. The restarter cohort included those who were restarting a COC after a period of non-use of ≥6 months. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for high dimensional propensity scores were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThe final cohorts included 55,139 first-time users (3582 drospirenone and 51,557 levonorgestrel) and 162,959 restarters (23,191 drospirenone and 139,768 levonorgestrel). The adjusted HR of VTE associated with drospirenone versus levonorgestrel was 3.19 (95% CI 1.12-9.08) for first-time users and 1.96 (95% CI 1.12-3.41) for restarters.
conclusionsWe found an elevated risk of VTE associated with drospirenone-containing COCs in comparison with levonorgestrel-containing COCs in both cohorts. While left truncation of healthcare databases is a concern for the identification of first-time users, the use of a more explicit cohort of restarters suggests a doubling of VTE risk with drospirenone-containing COCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.