Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382396›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Retrospective evaluation of concomitant cetuximab and radiotherapy tolerance for locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment in patients unfit for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Audrey Rambeau, Radj Gervais, Dominique De Raucourt, Emmanuel Babin, Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué, Carmen Florescu, David Blanchard, Bernard Gery

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Impact of Early Supportive Care Assessment on treatment decision in head and neck cancer before concomitant chemoradiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey RambeauMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Av général Harris, 14000, Caen, France. audrey.rambeau@gmail.com.
Radj GervaisMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Av général Harris, 14000, Caen, France.
Dominique De RaucourtDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
Emmanuel BabinDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 14000, Caen, France.
Audrey Emmanuelle DuguéClinical Research unit, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
Carmen FlorescuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Head and Neck Unit, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
David BlanchardDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
Bernard GeryDepartment of Radiotherapy, Head and Neck Unit, Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
Centre François Baclesse · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy associated with cetuximab (Cet-RT) is an alternative treatment to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LAHNC). Reviews suggest that the use of cetuximab is associated with poorer tolerance in patients unfit for chemotherapy than in pivotal trial. We retrospectively studied patients first treated by Cet-RT for LAHNC presenting contraindications to chemoradiotherapy. Objectives were treated population description, acute tolerance, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 3-month clinical response. Eighty-eight patients were included. Treatment was completed without delay for 43 patients. Grade 3-4 acute toxicity was described in 44.3%: mucositis (n = 20), radiodermatitis (n = 25) folliculitis (n = 10), and anaphylaxis (n = 6). Fourteen patients died during treatment. Median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 18.7 months, respectively. We confirm that Cet-RT tolerance in unfit patients is poorer than that in trials. Survival data illustrate patients' frailty and suggest that balanced use of Cet-RT is required in this population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHead and Neck NeoplasmsRadiodermatitisAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalChemoradiotherapyFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID28382396
OpenAlexW2604551104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.