Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382391›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

Maverick total disc arthroplasty performs well at 10 years follow-up: a prospective study with HRQL and balance analysis.

N Plais, X Thevenot, A Cogniet, J Rigal, J C Le Huec

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Substantial clinical benefit for Neck Disability Index revisited: establishing the goal for treatment?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Trial
  3. A 7-year minimum follow-up of the M6-L total disk replacement for low back pain with radiculopathy in young railway employees: a retrospective single-center study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. [Long-Term Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Maverick].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes.International journal of spine surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: single centre 20 years experience.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  9. Artificial disc replacement in spine surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2018.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  12. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2018.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  13. We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.International journal of spine surgery · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N PlaisOrthospine Department Pr Le Huec JC, Bordeaux University Hospital, 6th Floor, CHU Pellegrin, Place A Raba Leon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
X ThevenotOrthospine Department Pr Le Huec JC, Bordeaux University Hospital, 6th Floor, CHU Pellegrin, Place A Raba Leon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
A CognietOrthospine Department Pr Le Huec JC, Bordeaux University Hospital, 6th Floor, CHU Pellegrin, Place A Raba Leon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
J RigalOrthospine Department Pr Le Huec JC, Bordeaux University Hospital, 6th Floor, CHU Pellegrin, Place A Raba Leon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
J C Le HuecOrthospine Department Pr Le Huec JC, Bordeaux University Hospital, 6th Floor, CHU Pellegrin, Place A Raba Leon, 33076, Bordeaux, France. j-c.lehuec@u-bordeaux.fr.
Hôpital Pellegrin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe treatment of low back pain associated to Disc Degenerative Disease (DDD) is still controversial. Segmental Fusion is the gold standard, but many studies have reported that motion-preserving devices bring substantial clinical benefits to patients. Concerns on the associated complications and on the long-term clinical effectiveness of such instrumentations are still present and have led recently to a decrease of the number of Lumbar Total Disk Replacements (TDR). The objective of this prospective study is to present the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Maverick Lumbar disk prostheses (Medtronic, TE, Memphis, USA) at long-term follow-up.

methodsProspective, single center study of clinical outcome of the treatment with Maverick lumbar Prosthesis of patients with low back pain from DDD resistant to conservative treatment. Patients were examined preoperatively and at 3 months, 2 and 10 years post-operatively. Patients were examined preoperatively and at 3 months, 2 and 10 years post-operatively. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire were assessed to study clinical outcomes. Radiographic studies allowed measurements of range of motion, adjacent segment disease and pelvic and lumbar parameters.

resultsFrom an initial cohort of 87 patients who underwent TDR between 2003 and 2007 with the Maverick prosthesis, 61 were available at Final follow-up (70%). The clinical outcomes measured by VAS and ODI showed a significant improvement in all the postoperative stages of the follow-up (FU). At 10 years-FU, ODI experienced a mean decrease of 21.1 points, VAS for back pain decreased up to 3.85 and substantial clinical benefit was reached for 55.6% of the patients. Although Mobility of the prosthesis was preserved in 76.8% of the cases, TDR was not clearly protective against ALD.

conclusionsA significant, clinically relevant, and lasting reduction of back pain has been achieved in patients who underwent a total disk arthroplasty or a Hybrid construct with Maverik prosthesis. TDR is a safe and effective technique to decrease pain in patients with one or two levels of DDD.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTotal Disc ReplacementVisual Analog ScaleDegenerative disc diseaseHRQLLong term resultsLumbar spineTotal disk replacement

Identifiers

PMID28382391
OpenAlexW2605207739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.