Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382325›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2017

The future of ERCP.

Richard A Kozarek

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why is the rectal route for NSAIDS favorable for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis?Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Soft Liver Phantom with a Hollow Biliary System.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Sterile disposable elevator cap in the reduction of cross-contamination.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2020
    Article
  10. Use of ERCP in the United States over the past decade.Endoscopy international open · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard A KozarekDigestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID28382325
PMCPMC5378547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.